QUOTE
... and a huge empire of Egypteans worshipping Ra, yes. Also, Athenian and Roman cults, definitly count - Chistianity basically just adopted the apparatus of the Cult of Jupiter, remnants of which can be seen in using incense in catholic services. Hindusim - a religion by far older than Judaism, also applies. But not Shintoism, not as I have been explained it.
Actually, by the definition you posted? No they don't. You specifically said 'omnipresent and omnipotent'...things that only arrived on the scene as the Abrahaminic faiths matured. The Egyptian gods, the greco-roman cults, none of the historically recognized religions had omnipresent omnipotent gods. Ra was in the sky, on a boat in the underworld... someplace specific. You could HIDE from Ra... In other words, he reads more like a Kami than a God... by your definition.
QUOTE
So where's the offense? I didn't say they don't count as a religion (neither did I say that about Shinto)? Besides, Buddhism both HAS an omnipresent deity type being (as Hindusim has, by the way) and is a rather dogmatic religion, too. Actually, the Ideas of the Buddah Siddharta and Jesus have some similarities, though Buddhism is about half a Millenium older.
QUOTE
Shinto isn't a religion
I already quoted the offending line, in bold no less, but here it is again. Now, if you had said, say, confucionism... well, its debatable depending upon who you ask, but yes, it does lack any real spiritual (godly) aspects, yet in every other aspect.
QUOTE
According to www.adherents.com and the World Christian Encyclopedia, they clock in as #6 (#5 if you keep the agnostic/atheist faction out of the equasion).
Now, Shintoism has it's cults that are fairly dogmatic, yes. But overall, from what I've been explained, it's a very loose tradition.
Now, if you want to continue discussing this, we better take this to PMs, okay?
I don't particularly, I just want you to realize that saying
QUOTE
Shinto isn't a religion
is likely to be as offensive as if I said 'Baptists aren't christian' depending upon whom you are speaking to. Baptists for one.
Me? I happen to study history and religion as hobbies, and I happen to enjoy Japan as an interest, so you managed to trip three buttons with me. Animist religions are no less religioius for being animist in nature, and predate modern religions by a significant margin (evidence goes as far as to suggest hundred thousand years if some statues are what we think they are...) and ARE religions. And Shintoism, complete with temples and monks and nuns, prayers, rituals and an afterlife fits every technical and layman definition of religion that I can think of.
Now: IF you really think it is debatable, and you want to change my mind, I suppose I could go PM, but I think I've made my case clear enough. You made a sweeping generalization and it was moderately offensive in its blindingly dismissive attitude towards non-abrahaminic faiths. As far as I'm concerned, my work is done. I've made a public correction for the record, which was my point.