Can I be honest here for a second? No ha ha jokes or sly asides or veiled potshots at anyone or anything (much as I try not to anyway, but...)
Dumpshock has always been really good for communication with the writers and developers of Shadowrun and the fans. I'm post-Fanpro days, so I only really know the dudes who ran or wrote for Catalyst, but still. There was always an open policy of "talk to us, we'll talk to you." Fans were promoted up into freelancers and were promoted up into line developers. While there was conflict, there was always resolution - and if the conflict grew way too much, the people involved either got put in place or walked away for a little while.
That's how a fan community should work. We should respect the people that we're fans of, but we should always be willing to call them out when errors arise or boo boos are made. Critique is not in itself a bad thing.
On the other hand, I don't know if it's due to the changing nature of the internet or
Gabriel's Internet Fuckwad Theory (probably one leading into the other), but the culture has gone from one of respect to one of hostility. And I'm not talking about the CGL Crisis thing either - that I'll bring up in a sec - I'm talking about the out and out
French Revolution that passes for critique and discourse nowadays, on here and other boards, in the roleplaying community.
It's no longer, "this writer didn't check his math. Gun ranges should be XYZ." It's, "Quite
obviously, this writer has the math skills of an orangutang stuck in a zoo wiping feces on the walls." Or it's, "Hey, y'know, if you toss this together and this, uh, you can reach some pretty high damage, is that right?" Instead, it's, "WHAT THE FUCK YOU FUCKING MORONS, DON'T YOU KNOW TO GET THIS SHIT RIGHT THE FIRST TIME? I'M NEVER BUYING THESE BOOKS AGAIN. NEVER NEVER NEVER."
Recently someone started an errata thread on here with the, "obviously Catalyst is trying to sneak nerfs into the books without us knowing! How dare they! Don't they know
we're watching?" I mean, shifty paranoia jokes aside, that's just kind of rude.
Like Demonseed said, writers and developers should be willing to stand by their rules and accept honest criticism of them. Best example I can think of off the top of my head? When the new HMHVV rules came out in Runner's Companion (or was it Running Wild?) and people saw how nasty picking the virus up could be. I think Stahl nicknamed it the Zombie Apocalypse?
And the moment people started raising concerns, I remember Jennifer coming in and asking what people would want them changed to. No wishy washiness, no wringing her hands and trying to explain things, just a straight out, "okay, yeah, these are kind of wonky. How should they be changed?"
Interaction with the fans is a very important thing, but it needs to go both ways. The developers and writers have to respect that we, the audience, want rules and fluff that make sense and are articulate. The fans have to understand that a lot of the time, these people aren't being paid a whole chunk, any time they give is time taken away from making money, and hey, they're people too.
The above crap is why I've mostly fallen out of the roleplaying hobby / community, by the way. I'm sick of dealing with gamers that think that arguing with you about minute rules or just rules systems between editions is the most important thing ever. Meanwhile, I'm just trying to talk to my DM about how his Gencon went...
Now, I said I'd discuss how this is different from the Catalyst Crisis, and now I shall -
The reason that things got so crazy and overheated in here was that the majority of people involved wanted the best for Shadowrun. And with what LLC did, he put Shadowrun in serious jeopardy. It also didn't help that we had management that was looking more to cover their own ass and tracks than it was at allaying our worries about the game and the company.
Look: lying or spinning things to try and cover the fact that things are
seriously screwy is a bad thing. Lying does nothing but make you have to keep lying to cover up the lies you've already told. Remember when America first invaded Iraq, and
Bagdad Bob was trying to convince everyone that there were no Americans in Iraq and meanwhile there's actual footage on the television screens
right behind him? Kind of the same situation.
That's why things got crazy around here. And yeah, things did go a little overboard. Patrick probably shouldn't have gotten as much shit as he got. Several things got spilled that maybe, possibly, should have stayed personal. But it looked like Catalyst was a sinking ship and it was taking Shadowrun along with it. And people took that personally.
It's for precisely that reason that I don't want anything to do with CGL. They broke my trust. They lost several writers, artists and developers whose work I respect, over the course of
years because one guy had his hand in the piggy bank. That does not engender trust in me.
So I gotta agree with otakusensei. It looks fishy. All the more power to Catalyst for creating their own forums and place to speak. It'll be "safer" for the writers and developers to talk over there. Go for it. I'll hang out here with hopefully a few members of the old guard coming back around, and we'll see how Shadowrun progresses from there.
But again: I don't have much, if any, faith in CGL.
(No, I can't write a reply that's less than 1500 words. What are you talking about?)
(ETA: Actually, according to my word processor, I only wrote 998. WTF, me?)