Wintermancer
Aug 26 2005, 01:53 AM
And while we're on the topic of games, anyone know what the hell happened to Duality?
Gyrox10
Aug 28 2005, 03:48 PM
Just something to throw out: SR is entirely do able as a console FPS.
A friend of mine and I made a competent button config for the PS2 about a year ago. with a little work, you could incorperate everything in SR to Xbox without too much effort.
Would it be bitchy? oh yeah. Would it be fun if done properly? yup.
Lemme see If I can hunt down the text file I made with what we came up with (I dont think this is going to happen, as I've reformated some 4-5 times since then- but I'll still look)...
And, as a sidenote, SR as a FPS would alter quite a bit. Combat pool would probably be automaticly allocated based on a few presets. Gun skills would have a reduced karma cost(because they are infinitly less useful while you're aiming manually). I think the major thing a SR game would have to focus on is the style, and the content.
What the dev team for it needs to do is look at Vampire: Bloodlines. Ignoring thier shitty use of source, they did a good job of getting the feel down. Hell, Bloodlines felt like a SR game as often as not. Keep the Third/first view switchable.
As for spell damage staging- IIRC Xbox(and thus, xbox 360) has pressure sensitive buttons. light touch-> light damage smashing it in-> Deadly damage. not too hard to set up. spell targeting would require a bit more effort.
Wired reflexes would be bitchy as hell (If we want this to be multiplayer, and I for one do), Slowing things down doesnt work for multi- speeding things up doesnt work for people. I remember Perfect Dark solving this by having all players slow down, which was a really shitty decision, IMO. This would require some creative thinking. Speeding things up for the player(IE, move faster, faster tracking of the target reticle) might work, but that puts the player in a position where they need to be hyper alert to be able to control it at higher init levels(+3d6 and up). This would take work and playtesting. Lots of both.
Rigging is another thing that would be complecated at best. probably the best way to set it up would be to have something like a command map(Tribes 2 and Battlefield 2 both have these, dont know about anything else), who's contents relies on the sensors of the Rigger's network. with that you'd be able to issue orders to the AI somewhat well. Command Chair would be fairly straight forward. Still, its a complecated system that would take a heavy hit from not being done a DNI speeds. But that can be compensated for in a few, obvious, ways.
Decking( which I REALLY hope they put in) would be easy- if they got people who understand how the matrix in SR works. While it also loses lots from not being DNI, this is a problem for everyone, not just the decker.
Bottom line a great shadowrun game would have to be VERY comprehensive, and IMO heavily involve the SR community. But thats my two cents.
Personally, I think a few tech minded of us should get together and send them a big ole list of things they'd have to include, and a summery of how to do it. It would almost definitly be ignored, but it'd be a good time making.
psykotisk_overlegen
Aug 28 2005, 10:24 PM
I've just played Deus Ex for the first time (before reading this thread mind you), and I have to say it rocks. If they were able to make a game that caught the feel of both Deus Ex and the shadowrun setting, and threw in graphics and smart solutions to gameplay that match todays best FPSs as well as a large aand openended world with interesting NPCs, a bit like morrowind, fallout or arcanum I guess, it would totally rock IMHO. But I sincerely doubt they'll even make it half of what I want, and the first person view isn't very good foor melee, spellcasting, decking or npc-interaction imo (even deus ex "zoomed out" to 3rd person when you talked to people and changed the screen completely in the simple hacking you could do). And with that in mind they might be making a game that focuses less on melee, spellcasting, decking and npc interaction and more on one wired hero, with an APIII and a single linear plotline, wich is what comes to my mind if someone mentions a SR FPS.
I'd probably look into it if it ever came out for PC no matter what they made though.
Wildcat1
Sep 21 2005, 10:35 PM
for a FPS I always liked the original Thief and Thief 2. Haven't played the newest version yet.
The thing I loved about it was that you were best served by being sneaky. Stealth was the key, and for most 'runs it pays to be stealthy.
acesn8s
Oct 18 2005, 08:00 PM
QUOTE (sanctusmortis) |
Don't forget he said the magic words: he's working WITH THE FASA TEAM on the new SR game at MGS.
Yes, MS bought the people who made the Mechwarrior games. And they're good games. The MechAssault games are some of the best Live enabled games there are. It's a sort of "Mechwarrior 3 for simpletons".
As for firing modes, well, I imagine it'll work the same as Conker on the Xbox: hold down the mode selector button, it brings up a menu of them, pick one and let go, et voila! Spells could work in a similar vein, and so there are the worst problems.
What I worry about is capturing the feel of a run. Hopefully, the old FASA boys know what they're doing.
Hell, I'll probably buy it anyway. |
You said that they are working WITH FASA ??? FASA Sold out to FAN PRO/WIZ KIDS in 2001. FAN PRO says that they know nothing of any SR videogame as of March 2005. FASA dissolved and is no longer in the gaming world. Here is the link if ya need more info:
shadowrun info I am a big fan of the SR Series and have been playing since the early 90's. I currently play SWG and would LOVE to see some sort of MMORPG based in the Shadowrun world.
So MICROSOFT, If you are listening, don't waste your time on a silly FSP for a game console when you could have over 700,000 subscribers like Sony/Lucas has for SWG.
So to finish, unless I see some hard evidence, I'll beleive it when i see it.
Fortune
Oct 18 2005, 09:31 PM
FASA Interactive (or I think it might be FASA Studios now?) is a division/subsidiary/owned by Microsoft, and is part of their gaming department.
RunnerPaul
Oct 18 2005, 10:40 PM
Since not everyone was around for this, or wasn't paying attention at the time, the sequence of events goes a little something like this, if I recall:
The original company was FASA Corporation, makers of the tabletop games we all know and love. They spawned a spinoff company called FASA Interactive, which was created to handle the video game versions of your favorite FASA games. By having the video games handled by a separate company, they isolated the book publishing side of the business from disaster if the unthinkable happened and the video game business tanked. (Those Mechwarrior Virtual Worlds Entertainment arcades were a bit of a financial risk, after all).
However, because it was a separate company, they had to work out a deal that protected the parent company's intellectual property rights. They opted for the simplest solution possible: The parent company, FASA Corp, sold the perpetual right to develop electronic games based on FASA Corp's game settings, to FASA Interactive. (I say sold, but really, any moneychanging was little more than some accounting shuffling, since both companies were being run by the same people.)
So, around the same time that SR3 was hitting the shelves, FASA interactive announced the plans for a game called Shadowrun: Assassin. Details were sketchy, but supposedly the title character would have been a female elf assassin, and the game would have been various wetwork missions.
Soon after, FASA Corp. found themselves in need of an influx of cash, to buy themselves a few more months of solvency before they would go bankrupt. It just so happened that Microsoft Game Studios happened to really like the sales numbers they saw on the Battletech/Mechwarrior PC games, and decided that something that successful needed to be assimilated into the BorgMicrosoft collective.
Microsoft offered to buy FASA Interactive lock-stock-and-barrel. While it's true they just wanted the license to the Battletech/Mechwarrior franchise, and the programming team that had put together those particular games, once they'd made the offer for the company, it would have taken a lot of deal re-negotiation if FASA Interactive had wanted to try to sell back the rights to develop videogames for the other gameworld settings such as Shadowrun, back to FASA Corp, especially seeing as how they had a Shadowrun game in early production at the time.
In the end, simplicity won out, and FASA Interactive, and the associated video game production rights, ended up getting bought out by Microsoft. FASA Corp took the fat wad of Microsoft's cash, and used it so that they could put their house in order, allowing them to close up shop with their accounts in the black instead of in the red.
Now unfortunately, Shadowrun: Assassin was immediately shelved by Microsoft after the purchase, because they were afraid that it'd compete with a similar title they had in development at the time. However, they kept the licensing rights, and as it's been pointed out, they even kept the FASA Interactive going as it's own little autonomous unit, renamed as FASA Studio.
JongWK
Oct 18 2005, 11:30 PM
That's more or less what I heard, though AFAIK they didn't sell FASA Interactive to shore up the pen & paper line but to start new projects of their own (thus creating WizKids). I also heard FASA Interactive sold for $70 millions, but I never confirmed that number.
Nkari
Oct 18 2005, 11:44 PM
Im so dissapointed that it will be a FPS.. that means _no_ good story.. I want another RPG.. heck.. I wouldnt mind a MMO out of SR.. SR certainly has the potential for it considering the pen n paper rpg.. =)
ShadowDragon8685
Oct 18 2005, 11:46 PM
Why does that feel suspiciously like the start of a Megacorp entertainment cartel to me....
So what I want to know is, when does Bill Gates' BMW become a mobile block of extraterritorial immunity?
hobgoblin
Oct 19 2005, 12:10 AM
about the time we see food riots in new york...
Fix-it
Oct 19 2005, 01:34 AM
OW MY TEETH.
I'm sure there will be a crappy port to PC. Or we'll just all pira^H^H^H^H buy a copy.
/emulation baby!
Robotech Master
Jan 16 2006, 01:47 AM
QUOTE (Nkari @ Oct 18 2005, 06:44 PM) |
Im so dissapointed that it will be a FPS.. that means _no_ good story.. I want another RPG.. heck.. I wouldnt mind a MMO out of SR.. SR certainly has the potential for it considering the pen n paper rpg.. =) |
... Can we make it a rule that you have to read the God**** thread before you can post?
Edit: now that I look at the dates, I now look at this post and snicker at the irony...
Well, now I look like a retard. Oh well, I've made worse first posts....
Aku
Jan 16 2006, 01:53 AM
QUOTE (Robotech Master) |
QUOTE (Nkari @ Oct 18 2005, 06:44 PM) | Im so dissapointed that it will be a FPS.. that means _no_ good story.. I want another RPG.. heck.. I wouldnt mind a MMO out of SR.. SR certainly has the potential for it considering the pen n paper rpg.. =) |
... Can we make it a rule that you have to read the God**** thread before you can post?
|
only if we can also make it a rule to read the ^%$*#$ timestamps....
Robotech Master
Jan 16 2006, 01:54 AM
I'm sorry... I'm just a bit of an idiot today...
Has anything new come up about the game, or is it pretty much dead?
Aku
Jan 16 2006, 01:56 AM
Sorry, didnt read the join date for once, i find them to be unreliable. After all, all these people joined Feb 2nd or something, like, over half the board i think. psh, yea right. I think some AI adam just randomly assigns some of them....
As for new knews, i have no idea, i didnt get the 360 yet, donno if i will
Robotech Master
Jan 16 2006, 02:00 AM
Google didn't turn up anything... damn, I was looking forward to this...
Adam
Jan 16 2006, 02:24 AM
QUOTE (Aku @ Jan 15 2006, 08:56 PM) |
Sorry, didnt read the join date for once, i find them to be unreliable. After all, all these people joined Feb 2nd or something, like, over half the board i think. psh, yea right. I think some AI adam just randomly assigns some of them.... |
All the join dates are accurate except for the large group that are "26-February 02", which is when we moved from one piece of board software to another and migrated the previous users over.
Aku
Jan 16 2006, 02:32 PM
QUOTE (Adam) |
QUOTE (Aku @ Jan 15 2006, 08:56 PM) | Sorry, didnt read the join date for once, i find them to be unreliable. After all, all these people joined Feb 2nd or something, like, over half the board i think. psh, yea right. I think some AI adam just randomly assigns some of them.... |
All the join dates are accurate except for the large group that are "26-February 02", which is when we moved from one piece of board software to another and migrated the previous users over.
|
psh, Adam had to come and ruin my fun, i was just trying to instal some paranoia...
I know, bad attempt at it too, what can i sa, bad weekend...
Scyence
Mar 15 2006, 03:10 PM
Joined to actually let people know what little information I just recently found. Hot off the rumor press :
http://news.teamxbox.com/xbox/10464/Artist...s-in-the-Works/ Used to play lots of PnP rpg's back in the day including SR. Hopefully they do it justice !
SL James
Mar 15 2006, 04:32 PM
Pick a paragraph, any paragraph, and my first reaction is wanting to tear out my eyes while cursing the moon.
*mutter* damn moon... *mutter*
Wounded Ronin
Mar 16 2006, 12:35 AM
Eh, I now think that the only thing we need to make a Shadowrun video game is a really thorough patch of Deus Ex. I mean, since there's the SDK for it and everything I'm suprised that no Shadowrun fans have started to do it. All that you'd need to do is change the weapon skins, call it "cyberwear" instead of "nanotech", remove the reticle unless you have a smartlink, and you're good to go.
warrior_allanon
Mar 16 2006, 01:13 AM
please someone tell me i have permission to gut the writer of that horrible article. I promise to make their demise as slow and painful as possible....
please
Moon-Hawk
Mar 16 2006, 02:23 AM
Permission granted.
Jrayjoker
Mar 16 2006, 11:55 AM
What a pile of poo.
Valentinew
Mar 16 2006, 05:08 PM
QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685) |
The Sega game was a good SR game.
I'm quite sure they could've come up with something better than an FPS...
Like say, an RPG along the lines of Arcanum, if not an MMO? |
They
tried. It's my understanding that their chances for a pick-up by MS increase if the FPS does well....
mattness pl
Apr 3 2006, 02:48 PM
Good news, folks.
Can't wait for Christmas
.
Kagetenshi
Apr 3 2006, 04:17 PM
This must be some new use of the word "good" with which I was not previously familiar.
~J
SL James
Apr 3 2006, 04:33 PM
haha. My sentiments exactly.
Muskie
Apr 3 2006, 06:06 PM
<rant>Everyone knows that an SR MMO would kick the Pants off of most MMOs out there.. Look at what Stormreach did, and that's an honestly rather badly done MMO (not to mention there's no Solo content whatsoever, no crafting, no Monks, no Druids, no Halflings, no Dwarves... and 98% of players are Warforged barbarians, but I digress)
SRO Would be the next Anarchy Online. But alas, it's probably gonna be a First person shooter... yeesh, like we don't have enough of those...
It'd better come out for the PC. </Rant>
PBTHHHHT
Apr 3 2006, 06:15 PM
QUOTE (Muskie) |
<rant>Everyone knows that an SR MMO would kick the Pants off of most MMOs out there.. Look at what Stormreach did, and that's an honestly rather badly done MMO (not to mention there's no Solo content whatsoever, no crafting, no Monks, no Druids, no Halflings, no Dwarves... and 98% of players are Warforged barbarians, but I digress) SRO Would be the next Anarchy Online. But alas, it's probably gonna be a First person shooter... yeesh, like we don't have enough of those...
It'd better come out for the PC. </Rant> |
Whoa, I was checking out my friends copy of Stormreach, and messing around with the character creation system, I happen to recall halfling and dwarves in it.
I'll wait and see about the SR game and I won't hold my breath that it'll be any good. If it's good, cool, if it's not, oh well.
nezumi
Apr 3 2006, 07:18 PM
Considering how small of a market share SR has, I'm starting to wonder if any publicity is good publicity, though. Even a bad game may be good for us, if it creates brand awareness.
do i get any awards for starting the most-often-ressurected thread in the history of the boards?
DocMortand
Apr 4 2006, 03:48 AM
Don't MAKE me resurrect the Horrors thread.
Kagetenshi
Apr 4 2006, 03:48 AM
QUOTE (DocMortand) |
Don't MAKE me resurrect the Horrors thread. |
You're four and a half months late.
Or seven and a half months early, either way.
~J
DocMortand
Apr 4 2006, 03:57 AM
Hmm....*goes busily searching the archive for a long running older thread*
eidolon
Apr 4 2006, 06:00 AM
Echo Kage. Maybe it's like how in middle school "That's so baddddd" meant "really good".
QUOTE (nezumi) |
Considering how small of a market share SR has, I'm starting to wonder if any publicity is good publicity, though. Even a bad game may be good for us, if it creates brand awarenes |
I know it's a business, they need to make money, etc. etc. etc. I still can't help thinking "who gives a damn about brand awareness". Look what "brand awareness" did to D&D. If you have to nearly ruin your game to get the "market" to look at it, I'm not sure it's worth it.
And yes, I'm enjoying my descent into Grognard-hood.
SL James
Apr 4 2006, 06:55 AM
Hm... Even an FPS probably won't
kill the game.
Then again, after reading
this, I'm not sure there'll be anything to kill by Christmas.
To quote Jon Stewart, "and now for your moment of zen."
QUOTE |
C&GR puts FanPro at number three, with 3.66% of the market (around what they ascribed to it last year); with no ShadowRun 4th releases except the core book, ICv2 says the game "died a dog's death" in 2005 and leaves it out of contention.
...
For my money, it's not likely that there's much daylight between Steve Jackson, Palladium, Mongoose, and FanPro in the generic "fourth place" slot around 2%, and I'd toss Hero, Troll Lord, Privateer, Goodman Games, Margaret Weis, and AEG down around the "fifth place slot" and 1% or so each. With AEG seemingly out of the running in RPGs for a while, I'd say Green Ronin is probably the new third place holder as long as they can keep riding the Black Library, unless Steve Jackson or Palladium come roaring back. |
QUOTE (eidolon) |
Look what "brand awareness" did to D&D. |
Apparently, it helped reduce WotC sales by 35% last year.
Although it still apparently increased its RPG market share from 43% to 53% (which I imagine was helped only slightly by WoD's 61% drop in monthly sales).
JongWK
Apr 4 2006, 11:15 PM
Those numbers are misleading. They don't track direct sales, for example.
SL James
Apr 5 2006, 12:16 AM
It's quite an unfortunate fact that the author has a much clearer grasp of basic statistics than any of you do.
Maybe, I don't know, it could have come in hand with SR4.
But, seriously, that's the best you can do? Thank god for Battletech.
Kanada Ten
Apr 5 2006, 12:26 AM
/yawn/
Synner
Apr 5 2006, 01:32 AM
QUOTE (SL James @ Apr 5 2006, 12:16 AM) |
But, seriously, that's the best you can do? Thank god for Battletech. |
Nah, the best we can do is say that SR4 is well on its way to outselling SR3 in its first sixth months (and that was during FASA's heyday and the RPG boom) and the third printing of the core book was mostly sold on pre-orders alone. Oh, and Wizkids has confirmed it will be switching its novels to the SR4 setting after those already commissioned. There's the new international license and more likely to follow. And then there's the big stuff which will be announced soon enough...
But hey, read into it what you will, you always do...
JongWK
Apr 5 2006, 01:53 AM
QUOTE (SL James) |
It's quite an unfortunate fact that the author has a much clearer grasp of basic statistics than any of you do.
Maybe, I don't know, it could have come in hand with SR4.
But, seriously, that's the best you can do? Thank god for Battletech. |
In addition to what Synner said,
here is something that could be of interest. I'd like to point out at Zachary and Mike Mearls' posts at the end of the comments:
QUOTE (zacharythefirst) |
Very likely. From what I've seen, they get a HUGE number of direct-order sales. They claimed to be third in the market just a year or two ago, if I recall correctly. But I doubt we'll ever exactly know with Palladium. Third, fifth, or tenth, they arent' everyone's cup of tea, but I'm sure a lot of companies would like to be where they are (rabid fanboys, video game licensing, Bruckheimer flick in the works). Somehow, they just keep plugging away. Good for them. |
and
QUOTE (mearls) |
I can't talk about Wizards' sales numbers. I can say that nobody at WotC is talking about the death of gaming.
(...)
However, don't necessarily put too much stock in the WW numbers. C&GR and ICv2 are both likely measuring sales volume. WW might have lower total sales, but they release far fewer titles under WoD 2.0 than they did under 1,0. Plus, they're at 4 RPG lines (Vampire, Werewolf, Mage, Exalted), two of which are still relatively new. I think they do only 1 or 2 RPG books in total per month for the entire WOD, as opposed to 1 or 2 each for 4 to 6 lines. I think it's entirely possible that WW's total sales are down, but they're making more money. |
eidolon
Apr 5 2006, 02:21 AM
Meh. I wasn't talking about "sales figures". I was talking about driving a game into abject suckitude in order to appeal to the kiddies.
mrobviousjosh
Apr 5 2006, 09:00 PM
[QUOTE=Valentinew,Mar 16 2006, 12:08 PM] [QUOTE=ShadowDragon8685,Jul 20 2005, 03:25 AM] The Sega game was a good SR game. [/QUOTE]
The Sega Game wasn't bad but was hard as hell. And Stormreach does have halflings and dwarves. Apparently they plan on adding much more to the set as well (things like druids and monks, maybe even prestige classes). I haven't played the beta much or read a ton about it but if the sales are good it could expand significantly (perhaps even psionics). As for the 360 version of Shadowrun, I've played some good FPS with decent storyline, think Halo 1 and 2 or System Shock (computer). At least Microsoft will make it look pretty if nothing else.
Kagetenshi
Apr 5 2006, 09:05 PM
Please god do not think Halo. I haven't played through Halo 2, so I can't comment. Marathon, Pathways into Darkness, Deus Ex… there's a long list of strong-story FPSs out there. Halo is not one of them.
~J
mintcar
Apr 5 2006, 10:41 PM
I remember at one time getting to know your point of view about Halo rather thoroughly, Kage.
And for once I agree with you. Shadowrun requires more complexity and better story than Halo. (But Halo rocks anyway on it's own merits *ducks for cover*)
Kagetenshi
Apr 5 2006, 11:03 PM
So you did
But yeah, the story was a place we were in agreement. I'm not going to bite your head off over the rest, don't worry.
That's what I have ninja for.
~J
never presume a man does not have ninjas at his disposal.
Blacken
Apr 6 2006, 12:12 AM
QUOTE (Wounded Ronin @ Mar 15 2006, 07:35 PM) |
Eh, I now think that the only thing we need to make a Shadowrun video game is a really thorough patch of Deus Ex. I mean, since there's the SDK for it and everything I'm suprised that no Shadowrun fans have started to do it. All that you'd need to do is change the weapon skins, call it "cyberwear" instead of "nanotech", remove the reticle unless you have a smartlink, and you're good to go. |
I did.
Got tired of it halfway through.
EDIT: And for the record--how can you say SR for the Genesis was hard? I beat it when I was 7 or 8!