QUOTE (Thanee @ Jun 10 2009, 02:18 AM)

My thinking goes along those lines... they cannot precisely pinpoint the wireless device they are tracking, since that is impossible (only to about 50m, which is quite a lot in a city environment).
The only "giveaway" could be that Jazz was in VR-slumber for a while (really need to remember that, as it sometimes is a bit inconvenient

).
I don't want you to feel like you were cheated, so I'll provide you things Jazz could work out in time:
If you start with Track [BBB. pg227] and add some physical surveillance/recon and the fact that the camera has a limited PAN range it would not be hard to locate you out in the open. Had you been inside a car or van, they would have had to triangulate your position.
Remember: If you can see an active or passive node, you can determine its Access ID. Like when you were attempting to determine the Access ID of a traffic light.
QUOTE (Redjack @ Apr 12 2009, 11:56 AM)

As you can see the traffic lights AR, you won't need to scan to locate the node.
QUOTE (Thanee @ Jun 10 2009, 02:18 AM)

If not, Jazz will have to drive off for now. She is quite confident in her driving skills and visual identification of her should not really be possible with the helmet on. She can go into the Matrix from anywhere, so that shouldn't be much of a problem at least. Though there isn't a whole lot she can do from the Matrix, anyways (at least I wouldn't know what... other than attack the other side there, and cybercombat is hardly her forte).
So at this point in time, she should be confident that she has been identified (The helmet does protect her from facial recognition, spoofed access ID protects her from retroactive tracking). She is currently in an A/AA security rated neighborhood with a hidden PAN. That is a double edge sword. It presents additional scrutiny (no broadcast SIN) plus the fact that passive alerts will quickly be elevated to active alerts.