QUOTE (Draco18s @ May 4 2014, 08:29 AM)
That would be Filtering or Cleansing. Geomancy isn't a filter, it's a fundamental change in the source. It's supposed to be used to turn a Christian church into a Muslim Mosc or a Jewish Synagog, or a Druidic site.
In order to clean up a toxic dump you need to remove the toxic waste, you can't just "put a filter on it."
It's not a toxic dump otherwise it would be aspected to Toxic mages. It is an aspected site that does not respond to any single known tradition. Since it is an Aspected Domain, that means it can be aspected, so we're simply using Geomancy to change the aspect.
QUOTE (Draco18s @ May 4 2014, 08:29 AM)
While true, I'm at least using the rules to back up my point.
And so are we.
QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ May 4 2014, 06:59 PM)
No, You haven't. You have spouted an opinion with no backing. People may take up space (never argued that hey did not have any volume to them), but they are not a Place, they are an Object (specifically a Person). Look up those definitions and you will see they are completely different.
People are NOT Places. No matter how hard you want it to be true. *shrug*
....
/sigh.
QUOTE (Runners Companion, page 116, Astral Hazing, Second Paragraph, Second Sentence)
"Whatever the ambient mana conditions are, the character always stands at the heart of a Rating 4 backround count (see p. 117, Street Magic)"
QUOTE (Street Magic, Page 118, Backround Count and Magic, First Paragraph, Third Sentence)
"Though mana is readily available in domains and mana warps, the intensity of so much focused mana works against the magician in a similar way, tainting any attempts to use magic - unless the area is aspected towards his particular tradition (see Aspect, below)."
QUOTE (Street Magic, Page 56, Geomancy, First Paragraph, Second Sentence)
"This allows the gradual aspecting (p. 118) of ambient backround count towards the geomancer's particular style of magic."
EDIT: As far as people being sites? The rules only mention ley lines and power sites. It does not give us a definition of these terms at all; instead, whenever a game term is required to describe these sites it uses the term Backround Count. Therefore, a logical conclusion would be that any source of Backround Count is a ley line or power site and that either of those two terms are colloquialisms for the game term of Backround Count.
It is not a geographical location being referred to as a "site," necessarily, but only a "power site" which is not properly defined.