kigmatzomat
Sep 25 2005, 11:51 PM
p252 states that windows are "polarized" to prevent mages from casting at targets on the inside.
"Polarized" should be replaced with "mirrored." Polarized glass prevents glare and provides some darkening but is transparent.
Link.
cartoonlad
Sep 26 2005, 12:38 AM
Page 220: If you wanted to pick out a particular person's PAN in a crowded club, you'd roll Data Search + Scan program.
Page 225: Finding a particular node in a crowded area might be more difficult: make an Electronic Warfare + Scan (variable, 1 Combat Turn) Extended Test...
We are given two methods to resolve what appears to be the same task.
cartoonlad
Sep 26 2005, 02:50 AM
On page 106, the "Skill Ratings" section uses an Infiltration Test as an example, stating that a player is to roll Infiltration dice and Agility dice when attempting an Infiltration Test. However, every test listed in the book lists the attribute plus the skill, as in Agility + Infiltration Test. This would indicate that when making an Agility + Infiltration Test, the player would roll an amount of dice equal to his Agility plus dice equal to his Infiltration skill, plus dice equal to his Agility again. This interpretation is obviously incorrect, as evidenced by many examples. The example on page 106 should call this an Agility + Infiltration Test, not an Infiltration Test.
This becomes a problem in the Wireless World section as the majority of tests in this section are Skill + Program. Because skill ratings are added to the linked attribute to determine the number of dice (also page 106), a Data Search + Browse Test would require the player to roll a number of dice equal to his Logic attribute plus his Data Search skill plus his Browse program rating. However, there are various places where Skill + Attribute tests are listed as counter-examples: page 217 says that Matrix Perception Tests are Computer + Analyze instead of Perception + Intuition, which implies that the Matrix Perception Test does not include the dice from the Computer skill's linked attribute of Logic. As there are no examples in The Wireless World section that illustrate someone performing a Test, it is unclear if one uses the Logic attribute on these tests. As all other non-hacker test examples explicity state the addition of the attribute and these rules do not list the attribute, it is implied that one does not use the Logic attribute on these tests, which contradicts the rule on page 106.
If this implication is correct, the skill defaulting rules need to be addressed. A character unskilled in Data Search with a high Logic attribute using a Browse program to look up traffic information on the Matrix would have a better chance of doing so than the same character trained in Data Search (with skill ranking 1). In fact, there's no reason for anyone to take any Cracking or Electronics skills; hackers should simply create characters with insanely high Logic attribute.
If this implication is incorrect, the various test equations in the entire The Wireless World section should list the attribute in the test equations.
apple
Sep 26 2005, 02:10 PM
QUOTE ("SR4 340") |
The reflex recorder adds a +1 dice pool bonus to a specific skill or skill group (Combat and Physical skills only).
|
Navigation, Shadowing, Survival, Perception are all physical skills. Does this make sense? I think, it would make more sense if you insert a sentence like "on any test involving the selected skill that is
linked to Physical attributes."
SYL
Shadow_Prophet
Sep 26 2005, 02:17 PM
QUOTE (apple) |
QUOTE ("SR4 340") | The reflex recorder adds a +1 dice pool bonus to a specific skill or skill group (Combat and Physical skills only).
|
Navigation, Shadowing, Survival, Perception are all physical skills. Does this make sense? I think, it would make more sense if you insert a sentence like "on any test involving the selected skill that is linked to Physical attributes."
SYL
|
None of thos skills you listed are linked to physical attributes...nor would i consider them physical skills. As they're almost all completely mentaly based with (in general) very little phyical interaction involved (survival being the main exception to this as well building a lean-too would be physical interaction but you're not building it the same way twice ect ect ect).
blakkie
Sep 26 2005, 03:29 PM
QUOTE (Shadow_Prophet) |
As they're almost all completely mentaly based with (in general) very little phyical interaction involved |
Shadowing?

You do realise that involves moving as fast as your target without being seen?
Perception also involves turning your head quickly and such. In a session not so long ago we had captured a member of a large group we were trying gather information about, such as the location of their HQ and such. He had been knocked out in the fight. So i beat about the head and shoulders to make him really sore in the neck, busted a big toe, and made sure his eyes were nearly swollen shut. Then left him to discover himself alive and assume he had been left for dead. I beat him about the head/sholders to make it harder for him to notice me following him. It also makes it much harder to locate the source of a sound, as the way the human body works that requires that you move your head quickly to give your ears a second point of reference.
So as a GM you wouldn't have given him a penalty for noticing me?
The only one of those four i find dubious enough to possibly house rule out is Navigation, other than staying on track is a physical skill when you are walking through uneven terain, or perhaps using a paper map.
Rotbart van Dainig
Sep 26 2005, 03:33 PM
QUOTE (blakkie) |
Perception also involves turning your head quickly and such. |
Just, installing a reinforced reflex to do so isn't such a good idea... unless you want to be nicknamed 'wryneck'.
blakkie
Sep 26 2005, 04:27 PM
QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig) |
QUOTE (blakkie) | Perception also involves turning your head quickly and such. |
Just, installing a reinforced reflex to do so isn't such a good idea... unless you want to be nicknamed 'wryneck'. |
You mean you might instead want to install something that has you use a better technique and move in better form when you move your head to perceive something? But what would be call such an implant???
Shadow_Prophet
Sep 26 2005, 05:00 PM
QUOTE (blakkie) |
QUOTE (Shadow_Prophet @ Sep 26 2005, 08:17 AM) | As they're almost all completely mentaly based with (in general) very little phyical interaction involved |
Shadowing?  You do realise that involves moving as fast as your target without being seen? Perception also involves turning your head quickly and such. In a session not so long ago we had captured a member of a large group we were trying gather information about, such as the location of their HQ and such. He had been knocked out in the fight. So i beat about the head and shoulders to make him really sore in the neck, busted a big toe, and made sure his eyes were nearly swollen shut. Then left him to discover himself alive and assume he had been left for dead. I beat him about the head/sholders to make it harder for him to notice me following him. It also makes it much harder to locate the source of a sound, as the way the human body works that requires that you move your head quickly to give your ears a second point of reference. So as a GM you wouldn't have given him a penalty for noticing me? The only one of those four i find dubious enough to possibly house rule out is Navigation, other than staying on track is a physical skill when you are walking through uneven terain, or perhaps using a paper map. |
Well first off. Shadowing is less of a physical skill and more of a mental skill. Knowing when to lay back. Knowing how far you can close on the subject. Figuring out what you should do in order to not look like you're following them. Anyone can walk behind someone at the same speed. Not everyone has the knowledge and skill to not make it obvious. It has very little to actualy do with physical movements. Its about timing that constantly changes depending on on what your subject does and your current surroundings. Theres not much you can record there reflexively as well your environment, and where you are, and such determines what you may react and do.
Where as firing a gun theres certain things, no matter the environmental conditions that you always do...line the gun up look down the sights, fire the weapon.
Perception being a physical skill? You're realy REALLY stretching it there blakkie. Honestly, turning your head? Perception is about noticing details. It has nothing to do with moving your head. You can not record your reaction to things such as noticing papers are out of order on your desk. Its memory. Its noticing somethings not right. Its that gut feeling that tells you someone's behind you. Its paying attention to those things in your perifrial vision. Turning your head does not play into this. You may notice something in your periphrial vision but that doesn't nessicarily mean you turn to look at it. Perception has never, ever been a physical skill. In sr3 it was based off of your intelligence, not your quickness since quickness would be the attribute you'd base how quick you can snap your neck around.
Navigation is another completely non physical skill requireing you to use points of reference, and infer your position on the map or wherever based on what you have available as cues. The trail marker. That land mark over there. Knowing which way is north. Very little physical parts to this skill. And the physical parts are a result of the skill but do not cause the skill to be used. Believe me, having done more than my share of orienteering, trail traveling, and such, theres not much you can record as well its going to be completely different at every single new location, the only things being the same would be whipping out the map and compass, or in shadowrun turning on that mapsoft.
Survival, out of all of those skills mentioned is the only one thats remotely physicaly related, and even it encompases far to much to be even classified as such for a reflex recorder. I would say it even being iffy on building shelters with it as the shelter building completely changes depending on your surroundings and matterials available. Building fires would be the the only real thing I could think of that would be recordable. The others theres just far to many variables to even think of recording and getting something usable.
apple
Sep 26 2005, 06:22 PM
QUOTE (Shadow_Prophet @ Sep 26 2005, 09:17 AM) |
None of thos skills you listed are linked to physical attributes...nor would i consider them physical skills. As they're almost all completely mentaly based with (in general) very little phyical interaction involved. |
All skills I mentioned are physical skill (SR4 page 113+), but are based on mental attributes. That is the reason why I think that reflexrecorder for perception do not make sense. It should be limited to combat/physical skills linked to an physical attribute.
SYL
blakkie
Sep 26 2005, 06:26 PM
Wrong place for this discusion....and you are Rong.
Shadow_Prophet
Sep 26 2005, 06:30 PM
QUOTE (apple) |
QUOTE (Shadow_Prophet @ Sep 26 2005, 09:17 AM) | None of thos skills you listed are linked to physical attributes...nor would i consider them physical skills. As they're almost all completely mentaly based with (in general) very little phyical interaction involved. |
All skills I mentioned are physical skill (SR4 page 113+), but are based on mental attributes. That is the reason why I think that reflexrecorder for perception do not make sense. It should be limited to combat/physical skills linked to an physical attribute.
SYL
|
Meh so they are. I still won't consider them physical skills as they have very little to do with the physical.
QUOTE |
Wrong place for this discusion....and you are Rong™. |
uh huh...
apple
Sep 26 2005, 06:36 PM
QUOTE (Shadow_Prophet @ Sep 26 2005, 01:30 PM) |
Meh so they are. I still won't consider them physical skills as they have very little to do with the physical. |
This is exactly the reason why I wish that a phrase like "linked to an physical attribute" is added ...
SYL
blakkie
Sep 26 2005, 06:39 PM
QUOTE (Shadow_Prophet) |
QUOTE | Wrong place for this discusion....and you are Rong™. |
uh huh...
|
Ya huh!
apple
Sep 26 2005, 09:35 PM
The HK XM 30 has a grenade link. SR4 knows only an airbust link.
SYL
Rotbart van Dainig
Sep 27 2005, 11:20 AM
QUOTE (SR4 p. 118) |
If the test fails, the character suffers Stun damage based on the harshness of the environment (DV = threshold x 2); she may not resist this damage. |
As this tends to make Survival very erratic, it would be better to make Survival the equivalent to normal damage resistance.
EDIT:
'Removing' the Threshold and using it as a DV to be resisted with Survival+Willpower produces results less extreme, and more streamlined to the normal damage system.
A clarification whether the prohibition of recovery covers First Aid would be nice, too.
Azralon
Sep 27 2005, 02:57 PM
QUOTE (sapphire_wyvern) |
Not really errata but could be cleaned up for future printing: the last sentence of the Improved Ability power description is redundant (simply repeats pricing information given at the head of the description, just like every other power).
Possibly errata: The description for the Cat Mentor Spirit says:
QUOTE | Unless the Cat magician makes a Willpower + Charisma (3) Test, she cannot make an attack that will incapacitate her target (ie., a Combat spell must be cast with a Force/damage level that will not disable). |
This looks like a hangover from SR3, when you chose a base damage level to cast a spell at, as well as a Force. It could just be redundant, tautologous language in SR4. I recommend cleaning it up anyway by deleting "/damage level " from the sentence.
|
IIRC, it's mentioned in an unfortunately nebulous "somewhere" that you can always choose to decrease the DV of your attacks. This would let a Cat shaman (or Cat hermetic, for that matter) fulfill the quirk.
blakkie
Sep 27 2005, 03:25 PM
QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig) |
QUOTE (SR4 p. 118) | If the test fails, the character suffers Stun damage based on the harshness of the environment (DV = threshold x 2); she may not resist this damage. |
As this tends to make Survival very erratic, it would be better to make Survival the equivalent to normal damage resistance.
|
Erratic? In which way?
calypso
Sep 27 2005, 06:07 PM
On page 212 it says that "For every x number of programs you have actively running, where x = System rating, your response is reduced by 1."
On page 225 it says that "Additionally, if a device is running more programs at once than its System rating, reduce the Response on that device by 1 per (System) programs (ie, a System 5 device running 10 programs at once suffers –2 to its Response)."
The first implies that if I have a System 5 device running 5 programs, my Response is reduced by 1. The second implies that I have to have 6 programs running before my Response is affected.
Calypso
Rotbart van Dainig
Sep 27 2005, 06:18 PM
QUOTE (blakkie) |
Erratic? In which way? |
In a bad one.
EDIT:
Those rules kill characters faster than Ebola... even those prepared and with professional survival skills: Either the day is perfect or you are screwed.
Using the Threshold as a DV to be resisted with Survival+Willpower still allows Joe Average a camping trip while making arctic trip hard but manageable for trained folks.
blakkie
Sep 27 2005, 06:39 PM
QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Sep 27 2005, 12:18 PM) |
QUOTE (blakkie @ Sep 27 2005, 05:25 PM) | Erratic? In which way? |
In a bad one.
|

Er, that's nice detail.

Let's try this another way...you don't like the all or nothing aspect of the damage since it lacks granularity to outcomes? So you are suggesting a better way is for partial 'failure' to meet the threshhold still reduces the damage by 2 boxes/hit? Because i do like that idea, and i do think that SR4 doesn't take full advantage of the fixed TN's support for the concept of partial failures.
EDIT: I see you added some detail, and ya i agree on that point.
Rotbart van Dainig
Sep 27 2005, 06:50 PM
QUOTE (blakkie) |
you don't like the all or nothing aspect of the damage since it lacks granularity to outcomes? |
Actually, it's three aspects:
First, that does not mesh with the usual Damage resistance rules.
Second, depending on the way you read it, as the use of First Aid may be prohibited, the DVs are to high for any normal periods.
Third, the lack of possibility of partial failure totaly ruins the dramatic aspect: No one would be able to crawl back barely.
blakkie
Sep 27 2005, 08:18 PM
QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig) |
QUOTE (blakkie) | you don't like the all or nothing aspect of the damage since it lacks granularity to outcomes? |
Actually, it's three aspects:
First, that does not mesh with the usual Damage resistance rules.
|
It does mesh much more with how Mana spells work (i.e. Stunbolt), but then i'm not crazy about the way they work. The environment doesn't have the ability to stage the damage up past the base DV though. I do somewhat understand why Stunbolt works that way, basically it is a combination of a throwback to previous SR and at least part of the point of Mana spells is to counter high Body opponents.
If Survival allowed a second soak stage then you'd have to up the damage to make something short of the Sahara/Tundra mean anything (although a case could be made it should be that way?), but in doing so Survival would become Ebola with a gutshot chaser for low Body characters even at the low levels.
QUOTE |
Second, depending on the way you read it, as the use of First Aid may be prohibited, the DVs are to high for any normal periods. |
If you allow automatic successes it's not too bad at the bottom end. You only need 4 dice to live on the street, what i think they mean by "urban".** The top end does start becoming cruel. A Willpower(7) Dwarf with Survival(6), a heat source, appropriate clothes, camping gear, and food/water can safely survive indefinately in the Arctic baring storms (which you'd need to he'd need to use Edge for). So i think it's close.
Have you ever gone winter camping/hiking? It is a demanding experience. I think what it's missing are just a few dice modifiers, such as the survivor aclimatizing, the ability to increase bonus dice over a number of days to represent building semi-permanent support, and perhaps a larger range of bonus dice for heating/cooling sources and gear. It wouldn't make it 100% realistic, but it would help a lot addressing the playability of the top end environments (which in the end should be fairly dangerous IMO).
** - This is actually something that probably should come into play for characters that take the Street lifestyle, at least unless some helpful social charity like the Universal Brotherhood is operating in the area.

QUOTE |
Third, the lack of possibility of partial failure totaly ruins the dramatic aspect: No one would be able to crawl back barely. |
It is a tough balance. Although the tension of whether you roll 4 hits does simulate the "just making it" somewhat, the 3 and 4 Threshholds do have that granularity issue of two bad days are going to knock any metahuman unconscious (and the second bad day is going to come quicker with the -2 dice).
Rotbart van Dainig
Sep 27 2005, 08:50 PM
QUOTE (blakkie) |
It does mesh much more with how Mana spells work (i.e. Stunbolt) |
Not even quite that... that mechanic is just here for Survival.
QUOTE (blakkie) |
If Survival allowed a second soak stage then you'd have to up the damage to make something short of the Sahara/Tundra mean anything (although a case could be made it should be that way?) |
What second soak?
QUOTE (blakkie) |
Have you ever gone winter camping/hiking? It is a demanding experience. |
The point here is... many people do it for a hobby, some for a living and some to live... the problem isn't even the Threshold (Teamwork is your friend in Antarctica), though, it's the fixed and rather high damage accumulating too quickly.
blakkie
Sep 27 2005, 09:29 PM
QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Sep 27 2005, 02:50 PM) |
QUOTE (blakkie) | It does mesh much more with how Mana spells work (i.e. Stunbolt) |
Not even quite that... that mechanic is just here for Survival.
|
The attacker side of the opposed roll is coming from the environment, so it is a fixed Threshhold instead of a rolled Threshhold. Other than that, it's a similar the same mechanic (dice pool modifiers and Countercasting support aside) except the environment doesn't scale up damage for "net successes".
QUOTE |
QUOTE (blakkie) | If Survival allowed a second soak stage then you'd have to up the damage to make something short of the Sahara/Tundra mean anything (although a case could be made it should be that way?) |
What second soak?
|
Er, i mean a second stage of rolling that is a Body soak roll. Poor wording, sorry.

QUOTE |
QUOTE (blakkie) | Have you ever gone winter camping/hiking? It is a demanding experience. |
The point here is... many people do it for a hobby, some for a living and some to live... the problem isn't even the Threshold (Teamwork is your friend in Antarctica), though, it's the fixed and rather high damage accumulating too quickly.
|
Well it is a hobby you need to invest more than a casual amount of learning and equipment in or you'll be scoring a ride home in an emergency helicopter, perhaps a ride delayed till the next spring whe you get your own private bag for the trip back. The base DV isn't so bad at all if you allow partial reduction for each hit.
Rotbart van Dainig
Sep 27 2005, 09:41 PM
QUOTE (blakkie) |
The attacker side of the opposed roll is coming from the environment, so it is a fixed Threshhold instead of a rolled Threshhold. |
Thats not what I mean...
QUOTE (blakkie) |
The base DV isn't so bad at all if you allow partial reduction for each hit. |
That makes the difference visible:
Instead of using the normal 1 Hit -> 1 DV, it uses 1 Hit -> 2 DV, or uses the mechanic of Magic for Physical Damage...
Ungood.
QUOTE (blakkie) |
Well it is a hobby you need to invest more than a casual amount of learning and equipment in |
Only with the rules, that doesn't help.
blakkie
Sep 27 2005, 10:04 PM
QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig) |
QUOTE (blakkie) | The base DV isn't so bad at all if you allow partial reduction for each hit. |
That makes the difference visible: Instead of using the normal 1 Hit -> 1 DV, it uses 1 Hit -> 2 DV. Ungood.
|
Says you.

I'd rather have seen that used more in the system. These high damage values are important to increase the shortterm danger. Changing to 1 box hit drops the danger a lot as you drop the DV to match. If you don't drop the DV it becomes a near certainty that at least some damage is done. When that occurs and you aren't allow to heal up the damage a spiral starts.
You are worried about evironment killing fast, but IRL failure is in fact a hell of a lot quicker death than the 8 DV/day of the Artic conditions.
QUOTE |
QUOTE (blakkie) | Well it is a hobby you need to invest more than a casual amount of learning and equipment in |
Only with the rules, that doesn't help.  |
That's why i suggested more of a range for equipment bonuses. It already helps to some extent in the rules, you'd need to burn "Edge" though to try match survival in RL.
Rotbart van Dainig
Sep 27 2005, 10:18 PM
QUOTE (blakkie) |
I'd rather have seen that used more in the system. |
As long as it does not use a different mechanic as the rest of the system...
QUOTE (blakkie) |
Changing to 1 box hit drops the danger a lot as you drop the DV to match. |
Not quite - it drops the speed of danger.
QUOTE (blakkie) |
You are worried about evironment killing fast, but IRL failure is in fact a hell of a lot quicker death than the 8 DV/day of the Artic conditions. |
Just that such critical incidents usually call for extra tests, resulting in additional damage if failing.
blakkie
Sep 28 2005, 04:39 AM
QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Sep 27 2005, 04:18 PM) |
QUOTE (blakkie) | I'd rather have seen that used more in the system. |
As long as it does not use a different mechanic as the rest of the system...
|
Ya, 1 box per, 2 boxes per, etc. when needed being defined as the mechanic of the system. *shrug* But that isn't so much the way they took the system. Instead they took it the direction that Survival is written in, more binary. Survival is just a more obvious example of the downside.

QUOTE |
QUOTE (blakkie) | Changing to 1 box hit drops the danger a lot as you drop the DV to match. |
Not quite - it drops the speed of danger.
|
Which is already a bit slow is some ways. -40 weather kills in hours for those not at least somewhat prepared, not the minimum 3 days that the Survival skill results in. Ebola is indeed slower than RL sometimes.

I'm not looking to get it up that fast though, for playability reasons.
I thought about it a bit more, and perhaps the problem is partially in the lack of Threshhold modifiers for some of the more key environmental factors such as Weather conditions. Then change it to 1 box/Threshhold with credit for less that the Threshhold hits. Or at that point you could just change the naming for that from "Threshhold" to "DV" and have Survival as soak-like reducing the DV. Either of those effectively equivalent ways does give the smaller random swing range, but also allows for defining truely dangerous conditions.
So akin to unDodgable damage.
Whether it really would be enough of an improvement to be worthwhile? *shrug* For as often as Survival is likely to come up i can live with the way it is, functioning basically as a Stunbolt that is gimped (no extra damage for net hits), with a fixed number of hits rolled at 1/2 Force cast, that is maximum overcast for Magic ranging between 1 and 4 corrosponding to 4 different classes of environments.
QUOTE |
QUOTE (blakkie) | You are worried about evironment killing fast, but IRL failure is in fact a hell of a lot quicker death than the 8 DV/day of the Artic conditions. |
Just that such critical incidents usually call for extra tests, resulting in additional damage if failing.
|
Example? Not sure what you are refering to here.
Rotbart van Dainig
Sep 28 2005, 06:30 AM
QUOTE (blakkie) |
Or at that point you could just change the naming for that from "Threshhold" to "DV" and have Survival as soak-like reducing the DV. |
Been there.

Even that gets pretty nasty if you don't use optimal conditions - there is a load of negative modifiers... but yeah, thats kinda slow.
On the other hand, when allowing the use of First Aid, being sparse with negative modifiers and counting any closed shelter as the 8h-place, the rules may work over a normal timeframe.
QUOTE (blakkie) |
Whether it really would be enough of an improvement to be worthwhile? |
For those mercs out there? Definitively.

QUOTE (blakkie) |
Example? Not sure what you are refering to here. |
Mainly involving Athletics.
Nikoli
Sep 28 2005, 01:13 PM
Well, doesn't having the survival skill preclude being totally unprepared. Every survivalist I know knows a few tricks for getting by a little longer if caught in the wild with nothing, even in the arctic (though I have nothing but respect for theose hardy fools that eke out a life in those inhospitible areas.)
blakkie
Sep 28 2005, 02:21 PM
QUOTE (Nikoli) |
Well, doesn't having the survival skill preclude being totally unprepared. Every survivalist I know knows a few tricks for getting by a little longer if caught in the wild with nothing, even in the arctic (though I have nothing but respect for theose hardy fools that eke out a life in those inhospitible areas.) |
Being prepared is a huge part of the skill IMO. Including being ready to bring resolve to bear, and being acclimatized. But acclimatization doesn't fit into the Skill mechanism because of it is mostly a temporary effect. The human body is incredibly adaptable. Just watch people getting off the plane from very cold regions to a place where it is only a few degrees below freezing. They'll be comfortable in T-shirts and shorts (unless it is very high humitity, then they'll likely wear long sleeves and pants outside).
I've walked a 1/4 mile out in the open in 30 miles/hour wind and -30º with clothing i've spent the whole day outside in under normal conditions. It is scary how cold it felt, i definately wouldn't want to have to walk more than a mile like that at a time. But without being acclimatized and without proper clothing i would have had serious frostbite and would have been incapacitated just from that 10 minutes of walking.
Oh, and i completely get tying the skill to Willpower.
Feshy
Sep 30 2005, 05:19 AM
"Radical Eco-Shaman" lists "Spirit Bane: Fire Spirits" as 20bp. The Spirit Bane negative quality is 10 bp.
Also, is there any chance we can get bookmark tags for the individual sample characters in the PDF?
apple
Sep 30 2005, 10:22 AM
The sample characters have bookmarks in the new pdf-version (battlecorps).
Vehicle list: are that the size descriptions for Kanmushi/Microskimmer (they should be mini) and iBalll/Flyspy (they should be micro) correct?. And some prices on list could need a change (like the Nightsky)
SYL
Rotbart van Dainig
Sep 30 2005, 11:09 AM
Micro-Drones are smaller than Mini-Drones, both differ in Body, so those Descriptions are correct... check the Concealability Table.
apple
Sep 30 2005, 09:14 PM
Exactly: FlySpy/iBall are mini-drones ... the iBall fits into a human eye, the FlySpy is described as an large insect, where especially the Mikroskimmer ("smaller than a can lid") are described as being something larger.
Shouldn´t the iBall/Flyspy have body 0 and "micro". We are talking about drones with a lenght/diameter of perhaps 2cm.
SYL
Rotbart van Dainig
Sep 30 2005, 09:26 PM
Obviously not.
The Occular Drone can be piloted like an iBall Drone, but it isn't one... the latter is about as large as a Grenade.
Where as the definition of a can lid.... think beer can -
that lid.
marylayson
Oct 1 2005, 08:24 PM
Drugs and BTLs are described in detail on pages 248-251, but there are no prices or availabilities listed for them. Despite their combat effects and the addiction quality open to starting characters.
hahnsoo
Oct 1 2005, 08:33 PM
QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig) |
The Ocular Drone can be piloted like an iBall Drone, but it isn't one... the latter is about as large as a Grenade. |
And it can be equipped with a grenade as part of its payload... the Ocular Drone cannot.
Rotbart van Dainig
Oct 1 2005, 09:14 PM
An with a Flash Pack and three additional Sensors, too.
Magnus Jakobsson
Oct 1 2005, 11:36 PM
According to the description of the Con skill on page 120 "Con Tests are opposed by the target’s Intuition + Con (or Negotiation)."
According to the table on page 121 Con Tests are opposed by the target’s Charisma + Con (or Negotiation).
*
Also, the "Judge Intentions" attribute test on page 130 lets you "gauge another character’s [...] honesty" by making an an Opposed Intuition + Charisma Test against the target’s Willpower + Charisma. As there are skills that make you better at lying and detecting lies (Con and Negotiation), the Judge Intentions test shouldn't let you do that.
apple
Oct 1 2005, 11:42 PM
QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig) |
Obviously not.
The Occular Drone can be piloted like an iBall Drone, but it isn't one... the latter is about as large as a Grenade. Where as the definition of a can lid.... think beer can - that lid. |
Point taken for the iBall and the Microskimmer. But what about the Flyspy? A "large insect" with body 1?
SYL
Rotbart van Dainig
Oct 1 2005, 11:53 PM
True... in Shadowrun, 'large insects' usually are much bigger than that.

It should be about the size of a human palm, though.
Eagle
Oct 3 2005, 04:13 PM
I don't know if this one has been covered, under magic section, magical lodges, it says that magical lodges rating limits the force of the spell being learnt. Since spells are no longer learnt at a force I assume this is an error, which begs the questions what limits the ability to learn spells as related to magical lodges
cartoonlad
Oct 3 2005, 05:52 PM
There doesn't appear to be anything in the game rules to define a character as a Hacker. In my group, we had an interesting character concept come up where the character would do some matrix activities but not as much as what a pre-SR4 decker would do. Because there is no definition in game terms about how certain scribbles on a character sheet would represent a hacker, we ran into a problem when assigning some negative qualities that read "5 BP (10 BP for hackers/technomancers)".
Technomancers, Magicians, Adepts, and Mystic Adepts all have game-rule definitions -- they're the characters that purchased the positive quality. I suggest adding a Hacker 0BP positive quality and making the Cracking skill group's skills only available to those taking the Hacker quality.
Rotbart van Dainig
Oct 3 2005, 05:54 PM
calypso
Oct 3 2005, 05:59 PM
QUOTE (cartoonlad @ Oct 3 2005, 12:52 PM) |
I suggest adding a Hacker 0BP positive quality and making the Cracking skill group's skills only available to those taking the Hacker quality. |
Um. How does that resolve anything? How do you decide who can take the Hacker quality?
Prosper
Oct 3 2005, 07:57 PM
The Ruger Super Warhawk is listed as SS. Revolvers are semi-automatic.
calypso
Oct 3 2005, 08:28 PM
QUOTE (Prosper) |
The Ruger Super Warhawk is listed as SS. Revolvers are semi-automatic. |
Could you provide a reference? I see nowhere that says that all revolvers are semi-automatic (unless of course you were simply stating your opinion, in which case it doesn't really belong in the errata thread).
Calypso
apple
Oct 3 2005, 09:20 PM
Normal melee damage (fist, kick) is stun. With bone lacing or bone density it becomes physical damage. IMHO this doesn´t make sense (what about plastic boots?) or something like "can do physical or stun damage in melee" is missing.
SYL