QUOTE (Jaid @ Mar 5 2014, 03:31 AM)

which i'm sure will be just oh so *tremendously* difficult to spot given it has absolutely no dice pool to resist with. unless it's on a host, or your opposition is likewise investing in an expensive cyberdeck, both of which you seem to feel are unlikely. you need to know one thing about it. for example, "it's right over there where a spydrone/scout/etc spotted it".
Again, no.
YOU have to be familiar with the device, not have 2nd/3rd hand knowledge of it.
QUOTE (Jaid @ Mar 5 2014, 03:31 AM)

as to noise penalties, they're not nearly as big of a deal as you think. a datajack gives 1 noise reduction. a signal scrub program gives another 2. the datajack alone gets you to 1 km. the program added in will get you to 10 km. and even if you then go out to 100 km, you are left taking a net -2 penalty (0 against hosts, if they're used). so within 100 km i can interact quite easily with any device that is on the matrix. yes, it's at a penalty. no, that isn't a crippling penalty that will completely prevent me from being able to act. presuming, of course, that there is no further noise reduction gear available in the setting (which seems unlikely; just because we don't have it *yet* doesn't mean that it doesn't exist).
It's still something you have to account for and may not be able to reduce to zero, therefore significant.
QUOTE (Jaid @ Mar 5 2014, 03:31 AM)

if you don't have a host (or a cyberdeck), they have no meaningful defence. no host means i don't need an expensive piece of hardware to break in (or at least, not very expensive; you still need a deck, but not nearly as high of a rating). a host means i need an expensive piece of hardware to break in, but once i am in i have broken in to *all* of your stuff. if you have cyberdecks for defence, then by buying a single 400k nuyen piece of equipment, i have forced you to buy 400k pieces of equipment for every 4 soldiers (well, 5 if you count the guy with the cyberdeck, who is also an added expense).
Again. You're making assumptions not backed up with anything, barely anecdotal anything...... A device behind a good comlink will probably give your standard soldier 10-11 dice before using countermeasures such as matrix defence actions. While yes, that's not insurmountable, it's probably better than having been shot at with an assault riffle from within 100m. Not only that, if the decker is that competent, why is he on a battlefield? I sure as hell wouldn't be. I'd be getting a big paycheck protecting corporate Hosts. Your standard decker may take 3-4 actions to crack that while perhaps taking damage in the process..... against 1 soldier, when his side could have fielded 2-3 soldiers in his stead (depending on the deckers competence and gear levels).
QUOTE (Jaid @ Mar 5 2014, 03:31 AM)

and if it's not a huge vulnerability, why are you suggesting that each platoon would have matrix overwatch? if it isn't a threat, then what exactly are you protecting against? if it is threatening enough that now you need to spend the same 400k nuyen on defence (per 4 conventional soldiers, mind you) that you insisted nobody would be willing to spend on offence, then it is threatening enough to be worth spending a few thousand nuyen extra per device to design them to work without needing to connect to the matrix.
Those aren't my positions. You're concocting situations that are absurd to support your hate for a system you don't really understand and have seemingly not actually used in game. My position is that the cost and threat of a decker on a battlefield does not look good if you did a cost benefit analysis. They are not a front-line battlefield archetype. It's like putting a 'face', a 'retired cop' or the 'Rocker' archetype on a battlefield.
What i'm suggesting is that using your logic 'that hackers are a threat on the battlefield' i can come up with scenarios that still make it mostly a non-issue.
Shadowrun is not even about this kind of stuff anyway. We have street Samurai which are archetypes that may have been on a battlefield in some way. However, the system doesn't support this kind of play. On a larger scale you'd have mechanics that support squads (like warhammer 40K for example). The shadowrun system has been crafted to support playing with 2-5 runners on largely infiltration style missions. This is the same reason we don't have mechanics for how wage slaves use computer systems, because we don't need to know.
QUOTE (Jaid @ Mar 5 2014, 03:31 AM)

unless the cost of designing completely internal cyberware to interact through a cable or even just regular wireless rather than having to be hooked up to the internet exceeds 100,000 nuyen per soldier by a significant margin, someone made a gigantic screwup here. because if it only costs a few thousand nuyen per item to have an internal connection to each other, you can have 100% effective defence for a much lower cost.
Yes, but you don't get magical matrixy bonuses. That's just how the world works. Wikipedia makes stuff work better some how that our poor 2014 brains just can't comprehend. I don't see why that's conceptually so hard to deal with. I kinda believe that most of this wireless hate is just temper tantrums being thrown about having to make choices.
QUOTE (Jaid @ Mar 5 2014, 03:31 AM)

now i'm no military genius, but i'm guessing that if company A offers a military-grade product that will cost less than 10% as much to protect, and protects better than what company B offers, company A is going to sell a lot of product and company B is going to be firing a lot of idiot managers and engineers for incompetence.
That's what they used to have. Matrix Magic makes soldiers more effective at minimal risk and cost. with wireless on the soldiers are perhaps 10% more effective than before at the cost of a good quality comlink.
QUOTE (Jaid @ Mar 5 2014, 03:31 AM)

edit: also, just remembered... it's 3xrating for maximum number of slaves a device can have, so it's really 1 rating 4 cyberdeck per 12 devices... and anything else is completely vulnerable. the hacker will likely also need to cover his own devices, so really we're looking at less than 3 pieces of cyber per person... if they have eyes, a smartgun, and a smartlink on each soldier, then that's 4 soldiers protected per rating 4 cyberdeck... and then the hacker can't have anything that needs protection himself. it's also worth noting that while technomancers are pretty much worse than hackers, even having a technomancer on your side, which does not necessarily cost any money at all, forces your opponent to spend significant amounts of money on matrix overwatch. even having the ability to *hire* someone who has a cyberdeck forces your opponents to spend on matrix overwatch, for that matter... you don't need to spend a cent on offence until hostilities break out to force your opponent into either not using the full capabilities of the gear he bought, or spending big on matrix defence. but hey, i'm sure that won't bother anyone in the military at all..
Again, this was just me putting up to your made up problems. If you believe that it is worth putting $500k deckers into the field and you believe that this is something they'd actually chose to do then I can find expensive ways to counter it........ even though I think those contermeasures are largely unnecessary.
QUOTE (Jaid @ Mar 5 2014, 03:31 AM)

as to proof of wireless without being on the matrix, one only needs look at some of the wireless bonuses. a smartgun can let you wirelessly do stuff. it also has a wireless bonus that gets added in when it's on the matrix. the microtransceiver has a matrix bonus and literally cannot function on a basic level without being wireless enabled. the datajack's bonus for being on the matrix is one that, if being on the matrix and having wireless enabled are the same thing, would always be available. the detonator cap has the base functionality that you can set it using a radio signal. then it has a special wireless bonus apart from that as well. a bug scanner, which must be able to read wireless signals, gets an extra bonus if it is on the matrix. a jammer, which must be broadcasting wirelessly, gets an extra bonus when it's on the matrix. every grenade launcher has a special ability to use wireless link detonation without a DNI, as does every grenade, if they are connected to the matrix. without the matrix, you need a DNI. if being wireless enabled and being on the matrix are synonymous, how is it that these (and probably other things which i have not listed) which *require* wireless capability to function on the most basic level have a distinct and separate bonus listed for when the device is on the matrix?
No-one is suggesting that things can't communicate with different protocols, it's just that Wikipedia is needed to get pool and limit bonuses or bonus stacking.