Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: I will Black Hammer your mom
Dumpshock Forums > Discussion > Shadowrun
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Demonseed Elite
QUOTE (kzt)
I'll ask you to supply a quote that says 'you can't wirelessly take over someones DNI and blast them with Blackhammer.'

Well, you can. Just not the way proposed in this thread. But under certain conditions, it is possible. Unless that is changed in Unwired.

They have to be using a wireless DNI, for starters. Which I personally think you'd have to be pretty insane to do in the world of Shadowrun, especially when you have many other options available to you (fiber optic cable, skinlink, hardwired in the brain).

Granted, there are probably a few clueless people in 2070. But if your runners are facing clueless people, they are still in the little leagues.
Redjack
QUOTE (Fortune @ Sep 15 2007, 05:35 PM)
I will point to the fact the the phrase 'account privilages'

QUOTE (BBB @ Pg221)
security level access.....admin access

In fact the book uses the term access.

QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Sep 15 2007, 05:44 PM)
what if one instead hacks a existing account?

That is actually the first way discussed to gain access to a system.

QUOTE (Fortune @ Sep 15 2007, 05:35 PM)
But, let me ask you this. Can you supply a quote that states that an 'account' is not created when one hacks into a system?

First, I did not say that an account couldn't be created during a penetration, just that that was not the only way to do it as Doc stated.

QUOTE (BBB @ Page221)
If a hacker wants to get into a node but has not acquired a passcode, then he must break in.
BREAKING IN
There are two method a hacker may employ to break in: on-the-fly hacking and probing for weaknesses.

As you can see though, the book actually reinforces my statement.

kzt
Yup. I meant ASIST. You can argue that it 'logically follows' that you can't do it, but it's kind of annoying to have some one who thinks that ASIST can't be sent wirelessly because it "logically follows"demand negative proof for his pet idea.
mfb
QUOTE (kzt)
Hence they must be allowed? If you can't cite a rule? Yeah, I'm being a dick, but the entire matrix rules are just a bunch of tired ideas glued together rather than a well though out system, so you have to reason based on how stuff would logically work, as the rules are of little help, particularly if you require proof that you "can't do x".

that's amazing. what i actually said is the complete opposite of what you apparently think i said.
hobgoblin
QUOTE (eidolon)
Yup. By my reading, if you are getting in on a stolen passcode/key, you are using a legitimate account with all of the associated privileges.

If you break in, you are treated as though you had an account at the level at which you managed to succeed in your break in attempt. Treated as though, but if the system notices you, it starts trying to bust you. If you had created an account, what reason would the system have for not considering you a legitimate user?

thats because unless your running admin or similar, there will be actions your accont is not allowed to do, or areas your not allowed to access. stay within those limits and its ok, walk outside of them and shit hits the fan.

kinda like real life security in a way wink.gif
Redjack
QUOTE (hobgoblin)
thats because unless your running admin or similar, there will be actions your account is not allowed to do, or areas your not allowed to access. stay within those limits and its ok, walk outside of them and shit hits the fan.

kinda like real life security in a way wink.gif

Even admin actions may be logged or trigger a passive alert. wink.gif
eidolon
Further along the line that being hacked in is not the same as creating an account, is the fact that edit "can be used to create, change, or delete accounts on a particular node", and that hackers do this so that "they do not have to hack in again". You can perform an Edit regardless of the level of privilege at which you have managed to hack in.

Hobgoblin, this would seem to address what you seem to be saying, which is that a system reacts when you overstep your created accont's privileges, but that isn't the case. A person that's hacked in can perform any action as long as you don't screw up and trigger an alert. If hacking in created an account, then it would seem that doing any action not allowed at the account's privilege level would either not work, such as if I were to log into my machine right now as a guest and try to install a program, or would set off an alarm of some sort.

edit: Actually, as I read more, it seems like there's really no reason whatsoever to worry about at what "account level" you hack into the system. Why bother going for that higher threshold when you can perform any of the listed actions anyway?

edit again: Okay, I think I've answered my own question. It looks like after hacking in, the GM is supposed to treat you like you had "legitimate" access at the level you made it into the system, and only make you roll tests when you perform something that would require a higher level of access. And as usual, that's completely up to the GM, as the amount of information about each level is fairly scant.
Fortune
QUOTE (mfb @ Sep 16 2007, 08:49 AM)
QUOTE (Fortune)
But, let me ask you this. Can you supply a quote that states that an 'account' is not created when one hacks into a system?

that's bad logic. just because X is not stated as being false doesn't make it true.

But that is not what I asked, or even meant to imply. I merely asked for a quote whereby hacking could be done without the creation of an actual account, which has since been provided.
hobgoblin
SR3, especially after matrix, had a similar system.

only that there you had a formalized list of actions.

a list that created just as much trouble, as it was kinda hard to figure out what happened when there was multiple attackers inside a host at the same time.
mfb
QUOTE (Fortune)
QUOTE (mfb @ Sep 16 2007, 08:49 AM)
QUOTE (Fortune)
But, let me ask you this. Can you supply a quote that states that an 'account' is not created when one hacks into a system?

that's bad logic. just because X is not stated as being false doesn't make it true.

But that is not what I asked, or even meant to imply. I merely asked for a quote whereby hacking could be done without the creation of an actual account, which has since been provided.

i see what you meant, and i probably shouldn't have assumed you were being obtuse since i don't think i've ever actually seen you acting obtuse. but from almost anybody else, it'd have been an obtuse question. (and just because there actually is a statement saying X is false doesn't make it good logic ;P)
Fortune
Bad wording on my part. smile.gif
Jaid
QUOTE (eidolon)
edit again: Okay, I think I've answered my own question. It looks like after hacking in, the GM is supposed to treat you like you had "legitimate" access at the level you made it into the system, and only make you roll tests when you perform something that would require a higher level of access. And as usual, that's completely up to the GM, as the amount of information about each level is fairly scant.

that's because it will vary from system to system.

in corp A, maybe the security guards are given 'security access' and security access actually just gives you the ability to activate (but not deactivate) defenses, view camera footage etc, whereas the actual security decker and shift supervisors for the security force are considered to have admin.

on the other hand, maybe corp B uses a totally different system, where user level access is all that's needed to do what corp A requires security access for.

it all depends on the system.
Red
QUOTE (TrankTrollman)

Yes. And I think that the core problem is that people keep assuming that you can get yourself complete Matrix immunity by just turning your connection off because you can do that with the modern internet. That is the sacred cow that is holding us back and making the game nonsensical. Imagine if the game allowed you to have immunity to Magic by just not believing the way you can in the current real world?


People are willing to believe that wireless black hammer can't hurt their raw brain because they know they have no wires in their brain unless somebody puts something there. People are willing to believe a manabolt can hurt their brain because of thousands of years of cultural lore. That's a lot of mental preconditioning to handle there, and people just aren't willing to hand it over.

QUOTE (TrankTrollman)

Fundamentally, the idea that you can achieve complete immunity to the Matrix, or even any protection at all by just not using the Marix is at odds with the entire rest of the Matrix fluff and compeltely incompatible with every single Matrix related event in Shadowrun history. Can you imagine what Crash 2.0 would look like if you could just unplug the damn thing?


Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what a lot of people (including Lofwyr) did. Unplug. And it worked so long as they knew about the problem before it was too late. The trouble was that most of the world never saw it coming. They were infected before it was too late. Or because circumstances dictated that they couldn't shutdown in time. Or they were infected after reconnecting because infected nodes were still nearby.

I don't find these elements are not as incompatible with lore as you suggest.

QUOTE (TrankTrollman)

In Shadowrun, people use active brain-destroying Matrix defenses. They don't just have some wiz encryption and a 5000 alphnumeric passkey that changes every week. If you could just shut out undesirable signals, people wouldn't do that!


They would shut down all undesirable signals if they knew what they were. But they don't. So you can either take the risk, and trust your firewall to go about your life. Or you can shut it all off when you need absolute isolation. For those that can't stay offline for convenience or monetary reasons, that's why you can the brain frying defense.

QUOTE (TrankTrollman)

In Shadowrun, people plug their brains driectly into computers. They don't just have all matrix information displayed on a screen. If you could keep Deus from devouring your brain by just leaving the chord out of your datajack people wouldn't do that.


Again, when AIs are involved, people often know too little too late. I'm perfectly okay with pulling out the chord, and taunting Deus the digital godling. Until one of his banded or drones kill me using the f = ma protocol called Reality.

QUOTE (TrankTrollman)

Shadowrun's Matrix was designed with no clear design intent. It's just a list of sci-fi tropes that are "awesome". And well, it doesn't work. It doesn't work because of Agent Smith, it doesn't work because of Script Kiddie. But most of all, the MAtrix doesn't work because game elements cannot exist in a void. The Matrix cannot do the things that it says it does if it is "optional".


Agent Smith is one of the reasons that Momhammer is simply unacceptable in SR4. Given the information presented thus far, I fail to see how these two things are mutually exclusive.

QUOTE (TrankTrollman)

For the game to function the truly paranoid should be investing in large Firewalls and getting a Matrix Specialist on their team. Not simply throwing their commlinks out the window and switching to Morse Code.


There are pros and cons to either method. GMs and players must simply deal with them. If large firewalls actually meant anything, it might be reasonable. But as it is firewalls and defensive matrix specialists are completely impotent. Momhammer is hardly a fix for this.

--

All of that said, people will not sacrifice this sacred cow unless a more complete picture of a new matrix reality is presented in its entirety. A piecemeal presentation of flaws in the existing system is too disorganized.
Ol' Scratch
Just... nevermind.
hyzmarca
QUOTE (FrankTrollman)
In Shadowrun, people plug their brains driectly into computers. They don't just have all matrix information displayed on a screen. If you could keep Deus from devouring your brain by just leaving the chord out of your datajack people wouldn't do that.




That assumption is a huge mistake.

In real life, people drive automobiles on highways. If they could stop themselves from crashing into concrete barriers at 70 miles/hour just by not getting into a car people wouldn't do that.


But people actually do that. By your logic, there must be some magical device, in real life, which allows any random malicious person to magically accelerate any individual to 70MPH and ram them into a concrete barrier that can be defended against by the use of an automobile.

But there isn't (catapults notwithstanding).

Then why do people drive automobiles on highways when there is a risk of a deadly crash? If we answer this question, then we can answer the question of why people use the matrix.

The most obvious possibility is convenience. Cars move fast. Cars can be used to get places fast. Driving cars on highways is one method of crossing long distances fast. And the convince of crossing those long distances quickly outweighs the risk of crashing.

It is the same reason anyone does something that can result in death.

The current problem is that SR4s attempt to universalize the matrix has greatly reduced the advantages of DNI. There is no mechanical reason for anyone but a matrix specialist to use anything but AR with a glove and glasses.
Nikoli
From what I understand, 99% of the users utilize AR, the remaining 1% being split up with Cold-sim, Hot-Sim, and treating their link like a gloried cellphone, doing everything through the little screen and on-board buttons.
Cthulhudreams
The point I think frank is trying to make about the matrix crash in part one is thus.

Modern 'secure' computer networks are kept seperate from unsecure networks, including the ones that run infrastructure and all sorts of things. Sometimes there are one way data diodes into the more secure network, but not always, and that just isn't permitted on alot of networks. And even those data diodes are very heavily protected, and certified by NSA style agencies to be secure against all exploits in approved configurations.

So the first crash is simply impossible if you allow network segregation to actually prevent people haxoring things. All the important stuff is segregated.

If you want to reunite the fluff and the rules, the rules have to allow haxoring into segregated networks.


Now onto a personal note: Also the stuff about 'modern computer security cannot hold back someone using a deck' really doesn't hold up to any sort of inspection - if decks give you unreasonable computer power maybe, but 'modern computer security' is 'if it really needs to be secure you do not connect it to anything else' I'm not entirely sure what the plan is there.

In 2070 this is going to happen all the time and anything holding any sort of paydata just isn't going to be connected to anything else.
BishopMcQ
QUOTE (Cthulhudreams)
anything holding any sort of paydata just isn't going to be connected to anything else.

This is exactly why in Shadowrun there are offline storage servers, and facilities that are not connected to the Matrix. For these facilities the hacker must go in with the team and access the computers on site.
Tarantula
QUOTE (eidolon)
edit again: Okay, I think I've answered my own question. It looks like after hacking in, the GM is supposed to treat you like you had "legitimate" access at the level you made it into the system, and only make you roll tests when you perform something that would require a higher level of access. And as usual, that's completely up to the GM, as the amount of information about each level is fairly scant.

Actually, for legitimate users, the computer skill is used. If you are in a system at user level, and you want to edit in a new administrator account, you use hacking + edit because you aren't allowed to edit it normally. If you had instead wanted to edit the contacts list, you could, with a computer + edit test because you are allowed to edit that file.

Also, its GM call, but I would argue that any uses of the hacking skill to go above and beyond the priviledges of your account level would result in an opposed test of stealth + hacking vs analyze + system for the system to notice your unallowed attempt.
hyzmarca
QUOTE (Cthulhudreams)
The point I think frank is trying to make about the matrix crash in part one is thus.

Modern 'secure' computer networks are kept seperate from unsecure networks, including the ones that run infrastructure and all sorts of things. Sometimes there are one way data diodes into the more secure network, but not always, and that just isn't permitted on alot of networks. And even those data diodes are very heavily protected, and certified by NSA style agencies to be secure against all exploits in approved configurations.

So the first crash is simply impossible if you allow network segregation to actually prevent people haxoring things. All the important stuff is segregated.

If you want to reunite the fluff and the rules, the rules have to allow haxoring into segregated networks.


Now onto a personal note: Also the stuff about 'modern computer security cannot hold back someone using a deck' really doesn't hold up to any sort of inspection - if decks give you unreasonable computer power maybe, but 'modern computer security' is 'if it really needs to be secure you do not connect it to anything else' I'm not entirely sure what the plan is there.

In 2070 this is going to happen all the time and anything holding any sort of paydata just isn't going to be connected to anything else.

I the 80s, when Shadowrun was made, every computer, even those that control nuclear missile launches, was connected to a phone line through a modem. Just watch War Games.

This is where you suspend disbelief. You must assume that the convenience of remote automatic missile launches outweighs the risk of Mathew Broderick singlehandedly starting World War III.
Cthulhudreams
Yah - but thats the 'everything is interconnected whether you like it or not model' which leads directly to blackhammering your mom. For no reason.

edit: Potentially via a trode net they are wearing though, because thats popular per the fluff

Which was pretty much my point. biggrin.gif
kzt
QUOTE (hyzmarca)
This is where you suspend disbelief. You must assume that the convenience of remote automatic missile launches outweighs the risk of Mathew Broderick singlehandedly starting World War III.

To quote someone "It's just a list of sci-fi tropes that are "awesome". And well, it doesn't work."

Is SR ever going to stop trying to emulate TRON? TRON is like Disco: It was stupid then and it hasn't improved with age.
Demonseed Elite
Well, regardless of what Shadowrun does now, we can't throw out the past setting material. It's part of the game. SR4 isn't new WoD, with a restart of the entire setting.
hobgoblin
iirc, the phone line in war games was put there by the creator of the system, unknown by the military. backdoors like that are classics, along with default password and so on.

like the highway analogy, convenience trumps security more then we want to think about.

hell, the biggest viruses lately that didnt use social engineering did just dumb ip number testing.

if this was then upgraded to a near-ai or full ai it could maybe find its way around by jumping around the main firewall by some back door some idiot staffer had put up because of convenience and never told management.

was there not examples of this presented in SR3 books? where a system protected by a frontal attack with the use of a choke point had a side entrance via some low level branch in some corner of the world?

http://www.gpf-comics.com/d/20040303.html
hyzmarca
QUOTE (hobgoblin)
iirc, the phone line in war games was put there by the creator of the system, unknown by the military. backdoors like that are classics, along with default password and so on.

Actually, WOPR was connected to the phone lines so that it could dial up nuclear missile silos and launch, which is far more cost efficient that installing dedicated lines. That was part of its intended design. The password used was a back door into the AI that was running onto the computer.

This can be compared to the use of Hot Sim by businessmen. Due to the automatic extra IPs granted by Hot Sim, you can get that important report done that much more quicker. In fact, AR is only preferable if you are multitasking in the meat world or if you have 4 physical IPs.
hobgoblin
has it been that long since i have seen the movie?

heh, nice kick towards government saving anyways wink.gif
hyzmarca
QUOTE (hobgoblin)
has it been that long since i have seen the movie?

heh, nice kick towards government saving anyways wink.gif

I might be wrong about that, but I do know that it had to be intentional on the part of NORAD because someone had to actually plug it in and Dr. Falcon left the project long before WOPR installed in Cheyenne Mountain, back when it was an AI project named Joshua.
Ranneko
QUOTE (FrankTrollman)
and two cellurlar phones can put out enough EMF to boil an egg.

No, they can't. This is an urban myth, which is easy enough to test too.
FrankTrollman
QUOTE (Demonseed Elite)
I could pick out each section and offer a counter-argument, but I think that's just going in circles given how long this thread has gone on. I've already explained why the initial post does not work at all. If the fact that it does not work makes Shadowrun unplayable, I think that's a determination each player has to make. But I certainly don't think it does.

Sigh. This is the core of the problem with the Unwired plan. With the Matrix in general, for that matter. There isn't a "counter argument" prepared, because there is no overall plan. Hell, there isn't really an available argument, because there is no plan. Not that the plan is bad - it simply does not exist.

The thing is that you can just have poorly understood physical principals in a book or a movie. The characters do exactly what the author intends for them to do, so if there's an obvious seeming exploit and noone uses it one can presume that there is probably some in-world reason why it doesn't work the way you'd think it does. Heck, you can even have poorly realized physics in a video game, because any action that the "author" didn't set up scripts for is by default unobtainable.

But Shadowrun as we are discussing it here is neither of those things. It is a cooperative storytelling game. And in a cooperative storytelling game it is not acceptable to have poorly realized physical principals. In a cooperative storytelling game there are multiple authors and each one of them is simultaneously thinking outside of the box and extrapolating from the established rules to create plausible effects.

Basically a story only needs one thing: Be Awesome. But a cooperative storytelling game needs:
  1. Awesomeness. If it doesn't make a cool sounding story, why do it?
  2. Simplicity. Because there are between three and eight people at the table it is entirely unacceptable for any one character's schtick to take long enough to resolve that other people don't get screen time.
  3. Extensibility. What happens when you throw a few extra kilograms on it? What happens if i's in space? Underwater? Covered in cheese? In copper foil?
    In a cooperative storytelling game you cannot accurately predict what is going to happen or which elements will interact. It's improv, and you need to be able to fairly and accurately model new and unique situations.
  4. Consistency. Not necessarily that the results should be non-random, but that the results generated by the game system should match what the fluff says is supposed to happen.

So when the rules say that you can unplug the internets at any time and be completely safe while the fluff says that the '29 virus and the early cyberterminal users walked right through all the old completely segregated networks - that's a fucking huge consistency issue. And that sort of problem is endemic to the Matrix rules in every edition of SR, and SR4 is no exception. And it's a problem because the people who wrote the Martrix never really addressed any of the issues past #1. Really, the Matrix has never progressed beyond the "pile of awesome sounding sci-fi tropes" stage. Essentially it's still in focus grouping after near 20 years of development.

---

And I don't see that changing.

QUOTE (demonseedelite)
Well, regardless of what Shadowrun does now, we can't throw out the past setting material. It's part of the game. SR4 isn't new WoD, with a restart of the entire setting.


You can and you will. Shadowrun's Matrix hasn't always just been bad, it's always been contradictory. And bad. Anything you write is going to contradict something because the Matrix doesn't hold together.

At some point, someone is going to have to take a step back and come up with a playable Matrix. And to do that, not only are basic assumptions going to have to be challenged, they are going to have to be explicitly made in the first place. But I don't see that happening in 4th edition. Makes me sad, but there it is. In several years I'll have free time again.

-Frank
BishopMcQ
Frank--Thank you for sidestepping every other person who posted and going after the "people who count" in what appears to have become a not-so-private war against the Freelancers.
FrankTrollman
QUOTE (BishopMcQ)
Frank--Thank you for sidestepping every other person who posted and going after the "people who count" in what appears to have become a not-so-private war against the Freelancers.

I actually have stuff to do and I can only post about once a day. This might surprise you, but there are limits to the length of post I'm willing to make. If there wasn't, I'd just write a complete version of Unwired myself and forget this entire discussion.

But since you seem to have nothing worthwhile to add, I think I'll have to get some advice from someone else:
    Does anyone know how one goes about putting people on "Ignore" while profiles are down? I'd really like to permanently ignore the Bishop because I genuinely don't think that I can say anything more to him without it getting really inflamatory.

-Frank
kzt
QUOTE (FrankTrollman)
At some point, someone is going to have to take a step back and come up with a playable Matrix. And to do that, not only are basic assumptions going to have to be challenged, they are going to have to be explicitly made in the first place. But I don't see that happening in 4th edition. Makes me sad, but there it is. In several years I'll have free time again.

I'm not just a single lonely voice in the wilderness biggrin.gif

And Frank, if you think med school will be bad, I suspect residency will be worse. It's nice that they can now only work you 80/hours a week for your huge salary of $30someK/year, but it's still 80 hours a week.
BishopMcQ
Frank, you are not alone in the need to limit the lengths of your posts. I was simply noting that despite the several logical arguments put forth in counter to your arguments, (Kyoto Kid, MFB, Doc Funk, and my own) you chose to instead target DSE's post and specifically quote the fact that he did not have the time or effort to continue arguing.

Throughout this thread, you've taken a passive aggressive approach to conflict. Your most recent post in this thread is a prime example of such. When confronted with an argument (in this case, the fact that you chose DSE's response in preference to others) you, instead of addressing the other arguments in the time allotted to make a post, tried to shield the issue and change directions. The call for an ignore, was effectively an attempt to poison the well.

As an active approach, until such time as you are able to ignore me through the profile, I will offer to abstain from replying to you directly. I hope that helps.
Kyoto Kid
...maybe a bit late to the discussion (crappy link tonight) but here goes anyway...

...I will agree that it is unfortunate that the one element which is supposed to be so central to the game has been a mess. Granted, as I mentioned before, predicting technological trends is akin to the old adage of predicting the weather in the Midwest, you don't know what will happen ten minutes down the road. In the past I have seen "futuristic" games play catch-up to some RL concepts, most notably, Information Technology.

In a way, I think I can understand where Frank is coming from. Now common sense would say that if you are not not operating in Hot ASIST VR, you are immune to "MomHammering". However the patchwork process of defining the matrix over the past 18 years Shadowrun has been around has left too many loopholes open.

Now based solely in the context of how the Matrix and commlinks are presented in 4th Ed, I disagree with Frank's premise. However, looking back at details of the "Crash of 29", I have agree with him on the fact that there is a huge inconsistency. It would have made better sense if (as in the television series Dark Angel) a worldwide EMP event fried computers and the communications net rather than a virus. This way it wouldn't have mattered if they were all interconnected or not. It also would have still triggered the various economic and political events as well as subsequent technological developments that set the scene for the Shadowrun universe. Yeah a bit cliche' but more logical. This way the concept "MomHammering" would not have a precedent and the rules for Hot vs Cold ASIST in 4th ed would be consistent with canon.

The trick is where do we go from here? Unfortunately the historical canon cannot be re-written so in a sense we are stuck with it. However, the concept of "MomHammering" or "BTL-ing" people (as a spin off thread discusses) is still way too broken even if it does contradict past matrix canon.
Cthulhudreams
Well ghost in the shell has it as a cool fiction concept, but thats not an RPG.

If we hive out DNI's that can work at range and instead zoom in on things like nanopaste trodes, is that even a problem?

CP 2020 (if I remember correctly) *had* black IC that could re-write personalities
Sma
After you get past the initial "OMG that makes like no sense at all !" moment you'll find out that giving out the ability to brainfry everyone anytime you feel like it isn't that bad.

It means that everyone will buy himself a biofeedback filter and install it in their datajack, in addition to the security programs they were running before.

Since that'll cost a bit of money the SINless are fucked even more than before, but thats not a bad thing since it allows for some fun stories.
Blade
I could give my advice on the topic, but it looks like it's some kind of belief clash, with everyone having ad-hoc explanations and simply refusing other views on the topic. indifferent.gif
Demonseed Elite
QUOTE (Blade)
I could give my advice on the topic, but it looks like it's some kind of belief clash, with everyone having ad-hoc explanations and simply refusing other views on the topic. indifferent.gif

Yeah, that's why I'm not going to argue with Frank, because it doesn't actually get anywhere.

I don't deny that elements of Shadowrun's past "lore" have issues with making sense. I never have denied that. I've found it only got worse when the novel writers were given very free reign to explain elements of the Shadowrun lore in ways that often made even less sense or even contradicted with the gaming material.

But as problematic as the past material has been at times, it isn't going anywhere. At least not yet. So we have to roll with it. I know the freelancers have all been more concerned with making the current system work than ensuring that past lore makes sense with it. For most players, the past lore consists of historical footnotes and they don't really spend much time examining it. And I also realize that the current system has had issues come up that were not considered during SR4 playtesting and we're working hard to address those.

I do actually find threads like this one helpful, up until the point where they become partisan, like Blade mentioned. It helps me figure out where there are actual flaws or considerations in the Matrix rules that need addressing. And no, that doesn't mean that we're going to scrap the entire Matrix and past Shadowrun lore to fix things, but we'll do what we can.
Aaron
I know this may have already been brought up in a discussion to which I'm late to arrive, but who walks around wearing their trodes? It seems to me like walking through a building on your bike; you can do it, but why? I mean, it's not like Joe Average going to be walking down the street and suddenly think, "Hey! I need to be in VR!" and collapse right there.

And even if the victim is wearing the trodes, I reckon they're probably "off" (which is to say, mostly off, see the whole gazillion-dollar iPhone bill story). Which means you have to spoof a command from the user to turn them on (I hope I don't have to argue that devices that are off are unhackable; they are in my game), and you have to do it from within three meters (admittedly, I'm applying common sense to the trodes' Signal rating here) assuming they're not using a skinlink. Then, once you've activated the trodes (assuming there's no boot time), you've got to spend a Complex Action or two to spoof or hack them while the owner needs to spend a Free Action to turn them off again.

Of course, if you hack the entire PAN, then you've got all sorts of nifty and evil stuff at your disposal anyway, but you have to hack the PAN. It seems to me that the easiest way to MomHammer somebody would be with an actual hammer.
Fortune
QUOTE (Aaron)
I know this may have already been brought up in a discussion to which I'm late to arrive, but who walks around wearing their trodes? It seems to me like walking through a building on your bike; you can do it, but why? I mean, it's not like Joe Average going to be walking down the street and suddenly think, "Hey! I need to be in VR!" and collapse right there.

'Trodes are not just for VR. They can be used to interact with AR as well.
Aaron
QUOTE (Fortune)
'Trodes are not just for VR. They can be used to interact with AR as well.

Fair point, but it doesn't address the other issues.
Fortune
I addressed the issue I quoted. But as to why people would wear them all the time in the first place, I think it answers that as well. Keep in mind that the Matrix, and hence AR os all-pervasive in 2070 society, and if you don't want to manually deal with AR, which can be inconvenient at times, especially when other options are available, you need a DNI-enabling device. There are only a limited number of ways for a person to gain DNI control, those being a datajack, or 'trodes, or nanoware like Altskin or nanopaste (am I forgetting any?).
eidolon
QUOTE (Aaron)
QUOTE (Fortune @ Sep 17 2007, 06:50 AM)
'Trodes are not just for VR. They can be used to interact with AR as well.

Fair point, but it doesn't address the other issues.

Ha, you still win. I almost shot coffee out of my nose.

Now if you'll excuse me, I need to be in VR right now. *collapses*
Aaron
QUOTE (Fortune)
I addressed the issue I quoted. But as to why people would wear them all the time in the first place, I think it answers that as well. Keep in mind that the Matrix, and hence AR os all-pervasive in 2070 society, and if you don't want to manually deal with AR, which can be inconvenient at times, especially when other options are available, you need a DNI-enabling device. There are only a limited number of ways for a person to gain DNI control, those being a datajack, or 'trodes, or nanoware like Altskin or nanopaste (am I forgetting any?).

Image link + haptic interface (I think they're called AR gloves, don't care to look it up just now).
Fortune
QUOTE (Aaron)
QUOTE (Fortune @ Sep 17 2007, 09:26 AM)
I addressed the issue I quoted. But as to why people would wear them all the time in the first place, I think it answers that as well. Keep in mind that the Matrix, and hence AR os all-pervasive in 2070 society, and if you don't want to manually deal with AR, which can be inconvenient at times, especially when other options are available, you need a DNI-enabling device. There are only a limited number of ways for a person to gain DNI control, those being a datajack, or 'trodes, or nanoware like Altskin or nanopaste (am I forgetting any?).

Image link + haptic interface (I think they're called AR gloves, don't care to look it up just now).

Hence the manual part of the statement in my post. wink.gif
Kyoto Kid
QUOTE (Sma)
After you get past the initial "OMG that makes like no sense at all !" moment you'll find out that giving out the ability to brainfry everyone anytime you feel like it isn't that bad.

It means that everyone will buy himself a biofeedback filter and install it in their datajack, in addition to the security programs they were running before.

Since that'll cost a bit of money the SINless are fucked even more than before, but thats not a bad thing since it allows for some fun stories.

...#1 yes it is for it radically changes the setting of the game if say my Matrix Violet could go around MomHammering everyone she doesn't like & spoof her trail afterwards.

...#2 unfortunately Biofeeedback filter and some of the other security countermeasures are Hacking programmes and not something that would be available at the local Best Buy or CommShack®. Encrypt (which is the only general use security programme) is so broken it is worthless.

...#3 I don't consider the random "out of the blue" instant flatlining of my character that I spent a good deal of time in designing to be"fun". At the very least I would expect to have my character go down fighting instead of just collapsing to the ground & having her brains ooze out her ears while she is shopping.
Dissonance
I'm aware that it's a wee bit off topic, but reading this thread just reminds me of a little bit of a snafu I ran into a while back. As a matter of fact, I think it first showed up when SR4 showed up.

I love Shadowrun. I really do. It's just that I've always lived in places where tabletop games are severely limited or entirely nonexistent, and I just really can't get the hang of play-by-post. I love the game, it's just that I barely ever get to play it. So, more than anything else, I buy the books for theme and atmosphere and just think how nice it'd be to play a game.

And then posts pop up on Dumpshock, pretty much the only freakin' Shadowrun site I know about that's actively updated and stuff. Posts that not only criticize the game, but nearly seem to suggest that people who like the new changes are moronic for enjoying them. And these posts drown out all the other posts from people who actually enjoy the game.

After a while, this actually ruined me on Shadowrun. It took me a good year or so to actually get my interest back, what with the releases of Aug and Street Magic and all that jazz. And things were good again! And now I'm seeing it all over again. I don't mind debate and discussion. I do mind the fact that about half the comments are positively vitriolic.

I know it's a selfish request, but please don't make me hate Shadowrun. I really enjoy it! And it's hard to enjoy it when this kind of stuff goes on.
Aaron
QUOTE (Fortune @ Sep 17 2007, 10:12 AM)
QUOTE (Aaron)
QUOTE (Fortune @ Sep 17 2007, 09:26 AM)
I addressed the issue I quoted. But as to why people would wear them all the time in the first place, I think it answers that as well. Keep in mind that the Matrix, and hence AR os all-pervasive in 2070 society, and if you don't want to manually deal with AR, which can be inconvenient at times, especially when other options are available, you need a DNI-enabling device. There are only a limited number of ways for a person to gain DNI control, those being a datajack, or 'trodes, or nanoware like Altskin or nanopaste (am I forgetting any?).

Image link + haptic interface (I think they're called AR gloves, don't care to look it up just now).

Hence the manual part of the statement in my post. wink.gif

Missed that, yeah. Consider your point conceded.*

*Only Fortune's point, that is. Not the rest of it. You know who you are. =i)
FrankTrollman
QUOTE (Kyoto Kid)
...#1 yes it is for it radically changes the setting of the game if say my Matrix Violet could go around MomHammering everyone she doesn't like & spoof her trail afterwards.

How so? There are already matrix based assassins in canon. There are Matrix assassin cults and even hordes of Matrix-based doom legions. I fail to see how this would be a radical change to the setting over say: Deus fragments, Dreamchippers, or Crashbug1.

QUOTE (KK)
...#2 unfortunately Biofeeedback filter and some of the other security countermeasures are Hacking programmes and not something that would be available at the local Best Buy or CommShack®.  Encrypt (which is the only general use security programme) is so broken it is worthless.


There are a number of problems with the way programs work. I don't think "The program list is stupid and broken!" is a good argument for how Matrix topology should work.

QUOTE (KK)
...#3 I don't consider the random "out of the blue" instant flatlining of my character that I spent a good deal of time in designing to be"fun".  At the very least I would expect to have my character go down fighting instead of just collapsing to the ground & having her brains ooze out her ears while she is shopping.


How do you feel about Sniper Rifles or Mana Bolts? Shadowrun has line of sight death effects. I genuinely don't see how another one more or less changes anything. Getting your PC whacked off camera is no fun, but that's far more of an issue with the sniper rifle than it is with the Manabolt or the Momhammer.

-Frank
Naysayer
I'm not privvy on Matrix-Assassins, but for all I know, everything and everybody that has ever been made die to death because of matrix-based attacks bought it either because at the time of the attack, they were jacked in, that is, directly connected to the matrix via DNI, or hooked or in some way connected to something vital which was, in turn, hooked up to or dependent on the Matrix/net, like say, a life-support unit in a hospital, an airplane, or a bottle of moonshine that he used to drink himself to death with because the crash deleted his entire identity.

But I don't remember anybody, ever, dropping dead because somebody loaded nasty.exe to a terminal 3 blocks away.

Now, my needs may be simple, but for me, that is enough...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Dumpshock Forums © 2001-2012