John Campbell
Dec 16 2004, 11:52 AM
QUOTE ("Kremlin KOA") |
My money is on the namegivers... but by a VERY narrow margin |
If you're putting money on it, that's clearly the smart way to bet. If you're right, you can pocket your winnings. If you're wrong, there's not going to be anyone left to collect from you, anyway.
JaronK
Dec 16 2004, 01:42 PM
That depends entirely on who one is betting with, now doesn't it?
JaronK
Austere Emancipator
Dec 16 2004, 02:00 PM
Since horrors are the ultrasuperhyperüber Primordial Evil, I wouldn't exactly count on them to give you your money once they've slaughtered most of earth's population and enslaved/are in the process of torturing the rest.
Kagetenshi
Dec 16 2004, 02:03 PM
Some of them can be quite indulgent. See Ysrthgrathe's letter above.
~J
Austere Emancipator
Dec 16 2004, 03:13 PM
Yes. The quintessential ITASPTMMFBATTLWMSYCDENN. Sort of like a mix of the good ole insane/animal/sadistic/monster vampires and the new angsty gothic vampires but with an ego that dwarfs that of any dracula. Still not the kind of critter a wise man makes a bet with, if only because of the 30-minute monologue about how Ysrthgrth the Magnificent (all good names have a distinct lack of vowels) played you like a pawn and knew everything all along and how it will feast on your soul and blah-di-blah-blah.
Thanos007
Dec 16 2004, 03:14 PM
QUOTE |
vSome of them can be quite indulgent. See Ysrthgrathe's letter above |
Yeah. About that letter... Consider the source. Every one seems to take it at face value. Ya know just because it's from a Horror doesn't mean it's a compleat pack of lies or twists of truth to make corruption seem a little more palatable. He/it could really care about name givers and have nothing to gain by that letter seeing the light of day. He/it seems like a pretty straight shooter and up right guy/thing. Ya know for a Horror and all...
Thanos
Kagetenshi
Dec 16 2004, 03:27 PM
There are two interpretations I have for the letter. One is that it is in some way deceptive or misleading, and that he gains something specific from its release. The second is that it is entirely or mostly exactly what it seems, and that he is releasing it because it amuses him and because he has nothing to lose from it; essentially, the Horror version of Agent Smith's rant to Morpheus. I personally prefer the second interpretation because it is, in my opinion, cooler, but the first is still valid.
~J
Thanos007
Dec 16 2004, 03:38 PM
QUOTE |
I personally prefer the second interpretation because it is, in my opinion, cooler |
I think your right but even so it's just tit for tat. You name givers are inherently evil(which I would argue against) so it's ok if we're evil too. Look at all the horrible things you name givers do. You're no different than us. Ye..no. Some of us are horrible. Some of us do evil. Not all of us. Horrors on the other hand are nothing but evil. Full of lies and corruption.
On a lighter note:
QUOTE |
Yes. The quintessential ITASPTMMFBATTLWMSYCDENN. Sort of like a mix of the good ole insane/animal/sadistic/monster vampires and the new angsty gothic vampires but with an ego that dwarfs that of any dracula. Still not the kind of critter a wise man makes a bet with, if only because of the 30-minute monologue about how Ysrthgrth the Magnificent (all good names have a distinct lack of vowels) played you like a pawn and knew everything all along and how it will feast on your soul and blah-di-blah-blah. |
30 minutes!! Pitiful mortal..er name giver! Your torment will last an eternity as my monologue continues to the end of time! bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha!
Thanos
DrJest
Dec 17 2004, 01:30 AM
Wow, I seem to have missed this one completely... how'd that happen...
This point has probably been made, but:
I say we DO stand a good chance against the Horrors. I think this because at least two of the entities who lived through the last Scourge (Harlequin and Dunkelzahn) seem to think it. They're the ones with the practical experience <shrug>.
kevyn668
Dec 17 2004, 01:47 AM
Welcome to the winning team, chummer.
durthang
Dec 17 2004, 02:54 PM
QUOTE |
Welcome to the winning team, chummer. |
You know, Queen Alachia felt the same way just before the last Scourge...
Bob the Ninja
Dec 17 2004, 04:37 PM
Alachia did survive the Scourge...just a bit pointier...
Kagetenshi
Dec 17 2004, 04:54 PM
It takes more than just surviving to be the "winning team".
~J
Pthgar
Dec 17 2004, 05:18 PM
I think survival would be enough. Where there's life there's Hope. Humanity might have to go through massive cultural changes or something, but those things don't last forever. In our entire history we've manage to endure all the varieties of horror (small h) done to each other. If we can survive the (big H) Horrors, we will recover.
On the other hand, if humanity survives untill the next upcyle of magic, the Horrors win too, don't they? Why in the multiverse would they want to kill off all their cows?
Kagetenshi
Dec 17 2004, 05:30 PM
Where there's hope, there are Horrors to feed on the destruction of said hope.
That was actually my point, though. Metahumans surviving means nothing. The Horrors just come back and feed again next cycle. The debate was over whether metahumans could stand tall and fight and repulse the Horrors rather than fleeing to Kaers.
Also keep in mind that not all Horrors seek overt destruction. Take a look at Chantrel: she survived, and I don't think she won.
~J
Pthgar
Dec 17 2004, 06:20 PM
Well, as for totally destroying the Horrors, possible but not probable. At least in this cycle. Namegivers are arguably getting stronger with each cycle, so eventually they might get it together enough to not only beat back the Horrors but totally stop them.
It's possible that in this cycle they can be fought off but I don't see any way to destroy them or stop them from accessing our plane this time around. Maybe next time.
Kremlin KOA
Dec 17 2004, 06:37 PM
the problem with your theory Kage is dragon history
The dragons had long term recording devices before we learned writing
their recordings show that Vergigorm, the King of all horrors, seeks the destruction of all intelligent life
Each time we survive to a downcycle we get "I'll get you next time Gadget" syndrome.
and each time we make it we end up stronger the next upcycle.
Herald of Verjigorm
Dec 17 2004, 06:59 PM
QUOTE (Kremlin KOA @ Dec 17 2004, 01:37 PM) |
their recordings show that Vergigorm, the King of all horrors, seeks the destruction of all intelligent life |
No, their recordings show that Verjy wants to make dragons suffer and ruin everything that dragonkind worked for. If destruction was the goal, he wouldn't have bothered rewriting a few dragons, he would've just used their corpses to make more powerful agents of destruction and kept hunting those that lived.
Kremlin KOA
Dec 17 2004, 08:32 PM
Uh he wanted to destroy ALL the children of the original rebel horror... which happens to include ALL namegiver races
Da9iel
Dec 17 2004, 08:46 PM
It's a game. If the designers want the horrors to be beatable, they will introduce beatable horrors that can't keep up with the SOTA. If the horrors aren't beatable, I don't think the designers will publish a sourcebook about it. They'll just skip ahead to the next emergence from the cairns. Personally I believe (and I've seen hints) that the designers would (if this game stays in publication long enough) make the horrors at least survivable face to face. Hiding in cairns would likely be a lousy RP experience.
As a side note, forgive me for not reading all the 600+ posts before this one.
CircuitBoyBlue
Dec 17 2004, 08:50 PM
QUOTE (Thanos007) |
Ye..no. Some of us are horrible. Some of us do evil. Not all of us. Horrors on the other hand are nothing but evil. Full of lies and corruption. |
Do we know for a fact that ALL horrors are that evil? Is it not possible that back where they came from there were some horrors that didn't feel like coming here to be evil and do all those crappy things that the more malevolent/proactive horrors did?
Garland
Dec 17 2004, 10:17 PM
^
Aspiring Horror victim.
kevyn668
Dec 17 2004, 10:57 PM
QUOTE (CircuitBoyBlue) |
QUOTE (Thanos007 @ Dec 16 2004, 10:38 AM) | Ye..no. Some of us are horrible. Some of us do evil. Not all of us. Horrors on the other hand are nothing but evil. Full of lies and corruption. |
Do we know for a fact that ALL horrors are that evil? Is it not possible that back where they came from there were some horrors that didn't feel like coming here to be evil and do all those crappy things that the more malevolent/proactive horrors did?
|
Just ask every one you meet if his name is "Sparda."
(and hope he's the first one you meet...)
GunnerJ
Dec 17 2004, 11:13 PM
Aren't the dragons, technically speaking, Horrors?
Also, who's Sparda?
Cynic project
Dec 17 2004, 11:17 PM
Well, you see...All humans are evil.
Thanos007
Dec 18 2004, 12:23 AM
Da9iel said
QUOTE |
It's a game. If the designers want the horrors to be beatable, they will introduce beatable horrors that can't keep up with the SOTA. If the horrors aren't beatable, I don't think the designers will publish a sourcebook about it. They'll just skip ahead to the next emergence from the cairns. Personally I believe (and I've seen hints) that the designers would (if this game stays in publication long enough) make the horrors at least survivable face to face. Hiding in cairns would likely be a lousy RP experience.
As a side note, forgive me for not reading all the 600+ posts before this one.
|
Yeah. I said something like this about a year ago on this very thread. And your forgiven.
Thanos
Fortune
Dec 18 2004, 01:10 AM
I don't forgive! If I can read the whole damn thread, then everyone else should be able to.
Kremlin KOA
Dec 18 2004, 05:35 AM
QUOTE (GunnerJ) |
Aren't the dragons, technically speaking, Horrors?
Also, who's Sparda? |
Gunner the namegiver races were all created by a rebel horror... the original all mother
so yes dragons are decended from horrors... so are humans so are elves etc etc
durthang
Dec 18 2004, 06:04 AM
QUOTE (Kremlin KOA) |
QUOTE (GunnerJ @ Dec 18 2004, 07:13 AM) | Aren't the dragons, technically speaking, Horrors?
Also, who's Sparda? |
Gunner the namegiver races were all created by a rebel horror... the original all mother
so yes dragons are decended from horrors... so are humans so are elves etc etc
|
Assuming you believe the dragons. Personally, I trust a dragon about as far as I can throw them.
hyzmarca
Dec 18 2004, 07:11 AM
QUOTE (GunnerJ) |
Aren't the dragons, technically speaking, Horrors?
Also, who's Sparda? |
Technically, Horror Constructs and so are Metahumans.
However, you can't really calssify Nightslayer as a Horror. He was a Horror, then he decided to being one.
GreyPawn
Dec 18 2004, 10:16 AM
Who's to say the Horrors are not among us, in present day Shadowrun?
Regarding the Artificer question, even if it could use nuclear weapons in the world of Earthdawn, why would it in Shadowrun? The true objective of Horrors has never been utter and total destruction. Would -you- purposefully destroy your entire food supply? The Sixth World with 6 BILLION metahumans of every shape, size and color is a veritable buffet table for the Horrors, and they are probably immensely hungry after being away for so long. Besides, what sort of emotional torment and pain would result in being disintegrated in 3 seconds by a nuclear blast?
Put yourself in their position. If you were them, what would you do? I know what I would do. I would infiltrate the higher levels of government and the megacorps and control things there, manipulating humanity to do my bidding and lunching on occasion with the pain and suffering people see in their newspapers day to day and ignore. I'm surprised to see how many people vote in favor of the metaraces whipping Horrorbooty. A few things to keep in mind is that the dillution of everything was much less greater in the era of Earthdawn than it is in Shadowrun. The races were far fewer generations away from origination with the converted Horror who's tears spawned them.
And the Horror's we're talking about here aren't no cyberzombies with Adept powers. Some of them, in a modern setting, would be practically invincible. Artificer was mentioned, and links up remarkably well with Deus, albeit Deus would be a much MUCH watered down form of Arty. Another one thats just scary to think about is Bonecrown the Usurper. Bonecrown the Usurper adds another step to his karma rating for every five people that follow him or that follow people who follow him. This aspect of his Horror-ific nature wasn't so bad in a time when population was much much lower, though he did annihilate an entire empire, Thera or Parlainth, I forget which. Some simple math- If for every post in the Dumpshock Forums there was one individual who directly or indirectly followed Bonecrown's lead as Chief or President or CEO or what have you, he would have a Karma Step of 24,423. The statistical probability of him beating you in anything? Really really good. The only thing which might stand a chance against a horror like that would be Corrupt Karma. And hey, its a Horror Power.
Now imagine if ol' BC through some wheeling and dealing climbed to the top of the heap in a company through a few shady deals with a magic flavor to them. Lets say he's Juan Atzcapotzalco. Karma step of about 60 million. How do you roll that?
---GreyPawn
---Shadowrun-Online.com
Austere Emancipator
Dec 18 2004, 11:16 AM
QUOTE (GreyPawn) |
Regarding the Artificer question, even if it could use nuclear weapons in the world of Earthdawn [...] |
It couldn't, or at least it did not. The whole thing came up as a misunderstanding of a message that mentioned the Cermak blast combined with wishful thinking from one or more pro-horrors.
GunnerJ
Dec 18 2004, 05:40 PM
OK... dragons are Horror constructs. Check.
Now, Sparda? Also, Temper? And what do some of these things looks like anyway?
durthang
Dec 18 2004, 08:03 PM
Tempter looks like a burr you picked up in the woods.
Kagetenshi
Dec 19 2004, 12:35 AM
Bone Crown looks like any Namegiver it wants to save Dragons, IIRC.
~J
GreyPawn
Dec 19 2004, 01:43 AM
QUOTE |
OK... dragons are Horror constructs. Check. |
Kiiiiind've. Not really. In a nutshell, in the beginning there was only horrors. One of them felt like it didn't belong. So it flew off as far as it could go and saw the sun and had a self-realization of what "good" was. That emotion overwhelmed it, and it cried. From the first tear that dropped to the ground came the race of Dragons which were the closest in appearance to the ex-Horror. And then the other metaraces came from the following tears wept. Thats why Verjigorm hunts Dragons, because they were the first and the closest to the ex-Horror. That and she wants to create a race of beings able to ReName.
---GreyPawn
---Shadowrun-Online.com
GunnerJ
Dec 19 2004, 01:58 AM
Wait, woah, ReName?
GreyPawn
Dec 19 2004, 02:58 AM
Yes. ReName. Verjigorm hunts and kills Great Dragons. And she takes their clutches of eggs and corrupts them. Her primary goal is to create a new race, capable of ReNaming the entirety of existence and thereby remoulding the universe to the way it was before the Ex-Horror. For the life of me I can't remember what that Ex-Horror's name was.
---GreyPawn
---Shadowrun-Online.com
kevyn668
Dec 19 2004, 07:29 AM
QUOTE (GreyPawn) |
Yes. ReName. Verjigorm hunts and kills Great Dragons. And she takes their clutches of eggs and corrupts them. Her primary goal is to create a new race, capable of ReNaming the entirety of existence and thereby remoulding the universe to the way it was before the Ex-Horror. For the life of me I can't remember what that Ex-Horror's name was.
---GreyPawn ---Shadowrun-Online.com |
Nightwing?
@GunnerJ: Sparda was the name of Dante's father in the video game Devil May Cry. He was a demon that "...woke up to justice.." I think something may have been lost in the translation but he was a "demon" that turned against the demonic king and fought for humanity...
Kremlin KOA
Dec 19 2004, 02:42 PM
Her name was dragon
nezumi
Jan 1 2005, 03:39 AM
teh horers r teh luzrs!!!11 teh humns wil win go humns!!!!111
(An hour and a half left!! I breathed a sigh of relief when I realized my new year will be saved...)
Kagetenshi
Jan 1 2005, 03:44 AM
It was up with several hours to go, but I had much the same reaction.
Clearly the Horrors are toying with us like the insects you… er, we are.
~J
toturi
Jan 1 2005, 04:19 AM
[ Spoiler ]
Clearly, we are toying with the Horrors (un)like the insects they are.
Kagetenshi
Jan 1 2005, 05:08 AM
Clearly I just need to fly over there and smack you upside the aura

~J
Fortune
Jan 1 2005, 06:12 AM
Aura not!
toturi
Jan 1 2005, 09:54 AM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
Clearly I just need to fly over there and smack you upside the aura 
~J |
[ Spoiler ]
Clearly, you are Horror marked. Come then, and be purified.
jezryaldar
Jan 1 2005, 05:48 PM
My apologies also for not reading all of the previous post so if this was said...
But, to say they are beatable... that would be like saying we can "win" a war on a concept. Be it drugs, poverty, ect. Someone will ALWAYS want what someone else has and will be willing to destroy people/places/things for it.
So, the horrors don't have to be beatable or unbeatable, metahumanity just has to be corruptible. And if you look at them, that is what they are. They feed off of negative emotions. And they feed into them.
My vote, they are unbeatable. However, in a twisted sybiotic (Sp??) way, they are also tied to metahumans. Without us to feed on, twist and corrupt, what else is there.
Kagetenshi
Jan 1 2005, 05:52 PM
For most of the Horrors, that's true. For Verjigorm, not so much.
~J
draco aardvark
Jan 1 2005, 06:26 PM
Yea, reading the Earthdawn book it says that some want to eat "anything" some want just life, some want metahuman life, and that the most tearable of them feed off of negative emotion.
toturi
Jan 1 2005, 11:45 PM
QUOTE (jezryaldar) |
But, to say they are beatable... that would be like saying we can "win" a war on a concept. Be it drugs, poverty, ect. Someone will ALWAYS want what someone else has and will be willing to destroy people/places/things for it.
So, the horrors don't have to be beatable or unbeatable, metahumanity just has to be corruptible. And if you look at them, that is what they are. They feed off of negative emotions. And they feed into them. |
Exactly. Someone will ALWAYS want what the Horrors have and will be willing to destroy Horrors for it.
So, as long as metahumanity is corruptible, then it is always possible to corrupt metahumanity all the way around. Corrupting the corrupted as it were. And our negative emotions are like crack... soon the Horrors will be our willing slaves.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.
Dumpshock Forums © 2001-2012