QUOTE (3278 @ Oct 24 2009, 12:30 PM)

Gnashers are the only apparent exception to this, to my knowledge, as they'll eat anything but each other. But there's no indication they ate every tree in the world, or that they preferentially would eat a tree over a rock, given the chance. [They do prefer Name-Givers to rocks, however.] Horrors, page 79: "Gnashers are simply killing machines, driven by a blind, insatiable lust to devour." Were there enough of this one type of indiscriminate eater around for a long enough period to eat every living thing on the planet? By your own logic, apparently not: some things were still alive after the Scourge.
To my knowledge, Gnashers are the only type of Horror that behaves this way. [Making one wonder why they aren't Horror Constructs, but, you know, whatever.] There are other "mindless, savage Horrors" [Horrors, page 93], such as the "wingflayers, baggi, dread iota, and so on," and all of them eat Name-givers, and there's no indication any of them eat trees, as well. But I'm certainly willing to entertain the possibility: I have literally all the Shadowrun and Earthdawn books, so if you've got a page reference, I'm more than happy to look it up.
Exactly! That's EXACTLY my point that you keep arguing against! They 800 years to eat the earth down to bedrock and didn't even come close. There were still flowering planets which require a complex ecosystem to survive. It really torpedoes any theory that the number of horrors is limitless, because if there was, their would be limitless gnashers, and they would have eaten the earth down to bedrock.
I'm not particularly which part of this you don't get. Maybe it's the fact that 1/100th of infinity is still infinity, so even of gnashers only make up 1/10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000th of all horrors, there has to be an actual number of horrors. Thus, horrors are not limitless. Thus it is entirely possible to kill all of them.
But if I remember correctly, gnashers were actually pretty common. They showed up a fair bit and could across the barrier pretty easily.
The exact quote in the book is that 'Legions of these mindless entities swarmed across the world, devouring everything in their sight and leaving posioned wastelands in their wake'
So they are pretty common, and they did eat everything. So lets assume that they comprised 1% of all horrors, the total number of horrors has to be pretty small. Evidence? Assume they could eat 100 square meters of material a day, that means that in 800 years the gnashers could all organic material and soil on each if there was 3.8 million of them (approximate).. meaning that there is what, 380 million horrors? Heck, even if I'm out by a factor of 10, that still only gives you 3.8 billion horrors. Which is a lot no doubt, but not even as many as people.
Incidently, that is the number that would render the earth an inhospitable wasteland. As it patently didn't, we're talking 1/10th or 1/100th of that number of horrors. But I'm pretty comfortable with an estimate of less than 400 million horrors. It stacks up, is a seriously credible threat and doesn't wreck the earth. Maybe I've over estimated how much they can eat and it's closer to 10 square meters. Which isn;t true as the exact quote in the book is "These jaws allow them to eat their own weight many times over in mere minutes'
To me this gives a consumpation rate MUCH HIGHER than 100 square meters in 24 hours, so my estimate of total horror numbers is very conservative.
Either way, the number of horrors does have to be in that 400 million ballpark. It could be much less.
Seriously the 'destructive impact of the horrors' is approximately that of a 4 miles across asteroid or the volcano at yellow stone exploding. Very big, very dangerous, but definable, countable and beatable.
QUOTE
We have quasars at our command? Supernovas? Long GRBs? Man, you have a weird idea of how powerful humans are.
Err, all these things are stars, and my point was that using only a tiny proportion of a star's energy is unimaginably more destructive than the horrors themselves. The horrors are not that scary. They are actually frikken piss weak. Large rocks are more numerous and more dangerous.
QUOTE
How do you propose to do this? Bait them, I mean, to cross over in only one physical location? Assuming that there's a one-to-one correlation in physical space with the astral "bridges" the Horrors cross - and I agree there's some indication that this is true - they don't all come across at once, and once the mana level increases far enough, they're just going to cross over on multiple bridges, like they did last time. [Plus, they haven't just been using the site of the Ghost Dance this time; Hawaii and Crater Lake have already been used this time around, although those sites are now, I believe, currently nonviable.]
This gets the biggest lol from me - clearly you just make an even bigger mana spike, and go disrupt the other big sites with permanent background counts by building a nuclear reactor or toxic waste dump. This is the easiest part - you're trying to create an early bridge so you can fight them where you want - if you haven;t killed them before they all come over, you're going to need to start trying to send biological or chemical weapons back the other way as fast as you can.