QUOTE (Cain @ Apr 7 2010, 11:00 PM)
We've seen doubt coming from the person who was supposed to draw up the plans to pay it back. Now, it's entirely up to the will of Loren L. Coleman to pay it back as he sees fit, according to the public releases.
I might be wrong, but realistically, the woman who came up with the repayment plan was forced out. That doesn't look good. Additionally, Jason Hardy has said that he'd pay all the freelancers instantly, if he could. The fact that he isn't being allowed to really doesn't look good. And, we have multiple partners bailing out on CGL for nonpayment. If the fruit doesn't look good, there's a good chance that it isn't good.
I'm being as patient as I can, but the amount of distortions, whether willful or accidental, in such a small number of words is impressive. Point by point:
1) The interpretation of the public releases that you continue to rely on is incorrect, as I pointed out earlier. Jennifer was a valuable asset to Catalyst, but plans for moving ahead did not entirely depend on her. A plan has been presented to the owners, as I have pointed out previously. Other people are being brought in to help, as I have pointed out. Nothing in the public releases says it is "entirely up to the will of Loren L. Coleman to pay it back" unless you go with the distortions introduced by Frank Trollman. For more detail, see
this previous post by me.
2) It has been asked, repeatedly, the people not speculate on why employees left, as that is a matter between them and Catalyst. Yet you say "the woman who came up with the repayment plan was forced out" and continue the speculation without any grounding but your own assumptions.
3) The fact that you say I want to pay freelancers off, so it doesn't look good that they are not paid off, is a wonderful example of why I might prefer to be stingy with information. What I said was: "Strictly hypothetically speaking, I would like all books moving forward and every single one of them getting in the hands of fans. And of course I'm in favor of paying off all freelancers!" Did you note the "Strictly hypothetically speaking"? I'm saying that is what I would like to do in ideal circumstances, but circumstances are clearly not ideal right now. To try to portray the difference between that hypothetical and reality as evidence of me "not being allowed to" pay people off is a gross distortion of what is happening (and I don't pay people off anyway. I don't handle finances).
I would appreciate my words not being twisted.
Jason H.