Again, a lot of people see being forced out as when someone actively pursues a course of action for the specific reason of getting someone else to resign.
Any decisions made by CGL management, as far as we know, were not done specifically for the purpose of getting Jen to resign.
As has been stated in this thread, Jen was not just a CGL employee, but also a freelancer who was owed money. She may have felt that being in the position of overseeing collection of money, and being one of the people owed that money was a conflict of interest.
She has also been cited as one of the authors, or the author to pull copyright permission until paid. She may have resigned in order to again avoid an uncomfortable situation where she would be both working for and pursuing legal action against the same entity.
Neither situation, in my mind, or the minds of others, are examples of someone being 'forced out', but are a situation where personal ethics could play a role in their decision to leave.
Any decisions made by CGL management, as far as we know, were not done specifically for the purpose of getting Jen to resign.
As has been stated in this thread, Jen was not just a CGL employee, but also a freelancer who was owed money. She may have felt that being in the position of overseeing collection of money, and being one of the people owed that money was a conflict of interest.
She has also been cited as one of the authors, or the author to pull copyright permission until paid. She may have resigned in order to again avoid an uncomfortable situation where she would be both working for and pursuing legal action against the same entity.
Neither situation, in my mind, or the minds of others, are examples of someone being 'forced out', but are a situation where personal ethics could play a role in their decision to leave.
To-may-toe, To-Mah-toe.
You might not like to think of it as being "forced out", but the implication we're getting is that Adam, David, and Jennifer were put in a situation where they had to choose between their ethics and their job. In fact, all three have stated as much, so we know they were *forced* to choose between an intolerable ethical situation and the jobs they loved. In fact, according to Frank's sources (which can be verified), when David and Jennifer presented their findings and repayment plan to Loren Coleman, that exact same day they turned in their resignations. We don't know what happened in that meeting, but we do know that whatever went down, it was sufficient to apply enough ethical pressure to get them to quit on the spot. The implication here is that Loren Coleman demanded their resignations, but there's no way of knowing that.
To try and get this thread back on track, a question was raised on RPG.net over rather or not sales of the SR4.5LE will raise enough cash to save CGL. Now, the question is: how many people intend to buy a LE, who haven't already pre-paid for one?