~double sigh~
QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Jan 6 2011, 10:11 AM)
The misinformation that the barrier was failing in SoE was not introduced by me. I actively tried to correct it after consulting more than "faded memories" and provided page references.
Let's see: I wrote that SoE had the spirits and brought along the - what I called "solution" - the barrier, then you "reminded" me that
There is no resolution in SoE, with the Sylvestrines starting to fail despite efforts (SoE p. 119)So it was you who "introduced" the barrier failing, since the Silvestrines only possible failing is that their barrier doesn't work in the desired way anymore. From there on it was just a matter of different views and possibly bad choice of words on both sides.
QUOTE
In SR3, toxic background count directly added to spirit force aligned with it.
So now you constitute that the comet increased the toxic background of said region that already was at 5 prior to the comet?
QUOTE
There is no "derailing" as the situation in War! can't be discussed without context.
Are you actually claiming that in order to call the WAR! section "crap" one must know the SoE entry?
Sorry, but that's something I call bullshit. The things I outlined as being the parts that I deem in the "extremely crappy" category in the WAR! section (and the parts from my initial posting that you ignored in your first answer) can be seen as that without comparing them to SoE. It was raben-aas who said that while he totally agreed that the WAR! section is a stupid thing the SoE part was also crappy. I then just said that they are on different levels of crappiness, thus indicating that I personally agree that the SoE part has in my POV its faults. And from there you started that still needless discussion that SoE in your eyes is not crappy while our conclusion that WAR! is extremely crappy is still identical. And as far as this thread is concerned the only relevant part is the one about WAR! being extremely crappy.
QUOTE
Incidentally, the discussion was started by raben-aas liberally smearing around the label "crap" without any reasons given concerning SoE, then you chiming in.
It would have been better to simply ask first raben-aas as to why he called it "crap" and then possibly me why I agreed to a certain extrend (despite obviously putting "some" effort in making clear that these sections have different magnitudes of crappiness)? Would have been far easier and less derailing, because my simple answer would have been what I have written already twice (with different wordings) now:
And that's the point where - to me - it rightfully deserved the "crappy" label, since right there it shares the problem of potentially causing world changing effects and opening up the "bad taste" area, albeit not as drastic as the ones that come with WAR!. That's my individual view on the SoE section and it purely an expression of personal taste. Nothing to argue about it.
QUOTE
There is no blame, just correction – whether you "introduced" it or not is irrelevant to that, but you picked it up repeatedly as a fact.
And I still stand up to that: The SoE section to me still is crap ... but by far not in the regions that the WAR! section reached. So your "correction" is - as it often tends to be when it comes to personal feelings - quite useless.
Can I now ask for a third time that we agree to disagree on our indvidual views concering Auschwitz in SoE?